The Washington Post

Newt Gingrich seeks relevance at Reagan Library debate

Former House speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) is still seeking relevance in the presidential race, but his propensity to talk like the former college professor (which he is) tends to get in his way at debates.

While Gingrich is often the smartest guy in the room at these debates, he’s also a little too bent on proving it. Or maybe just not conscious enough that he needs to tone it down.

Instead of keeping things simple, Gingrich talks a lot about things he calls “Sarbanes-Oxley” and “Dodd-Frank” (both financial reform legislation that people tend to know a lot about in Washington, but tend to glaze the eyes of audiences — even of political junkies — outside the Beltway bubble).

At the same time, Gingrich has been a leading GOP voice for decades, and if he can recapture the magic with a novel proposal or two, maybe he can recover some traction and become relevant in the presidential race.

But we haven’t seen the signs that that’s happening yet.

Aaron Blake covers national politics and writes regularly for The Fix.


Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Video curated for you.

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.