The Washington Post

Obama taps two for Federal Election Commission

President Obama on Friday chose his first nominees in four years to the politically gridlocked Federal Election Commission, planning to tap the head of the California Fair Political Practices Commission and a veteran Washington election law attorney to fill longtime openings on the six-person panel.

The White House said the president intends to nominate Democratic elections watchdog Ann Ravel to fill the spot vacated by Cynthia L. Bauerly, who stepped down in February, and Republican lawyer Lee E. Goodman of the firm LeClairRyan to replace Commissioner Donald F. McGahn, whose term expired in April 2009.

Both nominations require Senate confirmation.

All current commissioners are serving expired terms, a situation that has galled advocates of tougher campaign finance rules, who have repeatedly called on the president to nominate new members.

Obama’s only previous FEC nominee, labor attorney John Sullivan, withdrew his name in August 2010 after his confirmation stalled in the Senate for more than a year.

Ravel has used her perch on California’s elections panel to spearhead an investigation into the donors behind a nonprofit group that funneled $11 million into state initiative campaigns. Her selection buoyed campaign finance reform advocates, who have long pushed the FEC to be more aggressive in that area.

This year, Ravel led an effort by state regulators to collaborate on ways to force politically active nonprofit organizations and trade groups to reveal their funders, saying the federal government has failed to act.

“Ann Ravel is an outstanding choice and has been a real leader in the area of campaign finance enforcement,” said Fred Wertheimer, president of the pro-reform group Democracy 21. He added: “We hope this may be the beginning of the country having a federal campaign enforcement agency again, but it will take some time to find that out.”

Conservatives reacted with caution to her planned nomination.

“I hope she will exercise her power with restraint and understand that the role of an FEC commissioner is not to be a roving police of political speech,” said Bradley A. Smith, a former FEC commissioner who chairs the Center for Competitive Politics.

Goodman brings a different background, having represented corporations, trade groups and political campaigns for the past two decades.

“He has a great knowledge of the law and the impact of the rules on real-world political activity,” said Republican election law attorney Michael E. Toner, a former FEC commissioner, who worked at the same firm as Goodman in the 1990s.

Matea Gold is a national political reporter for The Washington Post, covering money and influence.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Democrats debated Thursday night. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Chris Cillizza on the Democratic debate...
On Clinton: She poked a series of holes in Sanders's health-care proposal and broadly cast him as someone who talks a big game but simply can't hope to achieve his goals.

On Sanders: If the challenge was to show that he could be a candidate for people other than those who already love him, he didn't make much progress toward that goal. But he did come across as more well-versed on foreign policy than in debates past.
The PBS debate in 3 minutes
Quoted
We are in vigorous agreement here.
Hillary Clinton, during the PBS Democratic debate, a night in which she and Sanders shared many of the same positions on issues
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the polls as he faces rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz heading into the S.C. GOP primary on Feb. 20.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
Fact Checker
Trump’s claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion
The billionaire's claim is highly dubious. Based on the costs of the Israeli security barrier (which is mostly fence) and the cost of the relatively simple fence already along the U.S.-Mexico border, an $8 billion price tag is simply not credible.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read

politics

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.