The Washington Post

Postal bill clears Senate committee

A proposed rescue plan for the financially strapped U.S. Postal Service took a step forward Thursday when a Senate committee passed a bill that would end Saturday delivery in the future and make permanent a recent, temporary increase in the cost of stamps.

The bipartisan bill would also restructure the Postal Service’s health insurance program and a $5.5 billion annual payment the agency must make toward health costs of future retirees, two shifts that would cut significant costs.

The bill cleared the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee 9 to 1, with Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) casting the lone “no” vote. Tester said afterward that the changes would hurt mail delivery to rural areas and threaten the Postal Service’s mission of universal service. Six senators were absent from the vote.

Thursday’s action follows last year’s approval of a postal overhaul by a House committee. Key differences — among them five-day delivery, which the House bill would allow postal officials to start immediately — will probably be ironed out in a conference committee once each bill reaches the House and Senate floors.

After a vigorous debate, the Senate panel defeated an amendment from Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) that would overturn a federal ban on guns in post offices. But the senators approved a measure from Sen. Mark Begich (D-
Alaska) that would allow licensed gun holders to carry guns in post office parking lots as long as the state already allows them.

Begich said he wants gun owners to avoid being charged with a crime if they collect their mail at their local post office after hunting and leave their gun in the trunk or back seat of their car.

The Postal Service welcomed the Senate committee vote. The bill “provides the framework to return the organization to financial stability,” the agency said in a statement. “The bill also provides the Postal Service with the necessary flexibility to develop innovative products and services for the American public and to grow the business.”

The vote on the broader bill, after a year of negotiation by the panel’s top Democrat and Republican, however, left two key stakeholders unhappy.

Postal unions said the bill would cut services and thousands of jobs by eliminating Saturday service and shifting mail delivery to the curb from the doorstep.

“Unnecessary and damaging attacks on the Postal Service’s vital networks and its employees — such as those unfortunately included in [the bill] — would only send the Postal Service on a downward trajectory,” Fredric Rolando, president of the largest postal union, the National Association of Letter Carriers, said in a statement.

Commercial mailers, meanwhile, oppose a provision to allow higher postal rates that’s designed to bring the mail agency billions of dollars in new revenue.

“The Postal Reform Act would do serious harm to the Postal Service’s competitive viability by raising rates and cutting essential services,” the Greeting Card Association said in a statement, echoing the industry’s claim that making a 3-cent increase in the price of a first-class stamp and other mail permanent would cause mail volume to plummet.

The bill also would remove some authority from postal regulators to approve rate increases, another provision the industry opposes.

But the committee’s chairman, Thomas R. Carper (D-Del.), and ranking Republican, Tom Coburn (Okla.), said the bill would provide needed relief for the Postal Service, which would run out of cash and be forced to continue borrowing from the U.S. Treasury if Congress does not act.

“I hope the legislation will allow the Postal Service to continue to be relevant and vibrant in the years going forward without being a burden to the taxpayer,” Carper said.

The Postal Service could eliminate Saturday delivery only after mail volume drops below 140 billion pieces annually. Officials have estimated that will happen in 2017 or 2018. Postal officials also would be able to ship alcohol and enter other lines of business that are currently prohibited.

Lisa Rein covers the federal workforce and issues that concern the management of government.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
New Hampshire has voted. The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
What happened in New Hampshire
Spending per vote
John Kasich is running one of the most cost-efficient campaigns, bested only by Donald Trump. Ben Carson, however, has spent a lot for a fourth-place finish in Iowa and eight-place finish in New Hampshire. Data is available through the end of December.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
What happened in N.H.

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.