The Washington Post

Report: VA overstates how fast it provides mental health care to veterans

The Department of Veterans Affairs has greatly overstated how quickly it provides mental-health care for veterans, according to an inspector general’s report released Monday.

Contrary to VA claims that 95 percent of first-time patients seeking mental-health care in 2011 received an evaluation within the department’s goal of 14 days, just under half were seen in that time frame, the report found. A majority waited about 50 days on average for a full evaluation.

A similar claim that 95 percent of new patients in 2011 got appointments to begin treatment within 14 days of their desired date was also far off the mark; the report from the VA Office of Inspector General estimated that 64 percent of patients did; the rest waited on average 40 days.

The inflated claims, made in the VA’s fiscal 2011 performance and accountability report, come with the department facing growing demand for mental-health services, as thousands of veterans return from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Sen. Patty Murray, (D-Wash.), who is chairman of the Senate’s Committee on Veterans Affairs and requested the investigation, said the report is “deeply disturbing and demands action from VA. This report shows the huge gulf between the time the VA says it takes to get veterans mental-health care and the reality of how long it actually takes veterans to get seen at facilities across the country.”

Delays in treatment for veterans seeking help for post-traumatic stress can be devastating, Murray said.

“Getting our veterans timely mental-health care can quite frankly often be the difference between life and death,” she said.

On Thursday, Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric K. Shinseki said that the department will hire 1,900 mental-health workers, an increase of more than 9 percent, an action taken based on a review of mental-health operations that began in 2011. “We have made strong progress, but we need to do more,” the VA said in a statement released Monday.

The inspector general’s report concluded that the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), which runs VA medical care, lacks any accurate method of measuring how long veterans wait for mental-health care.

The data on whether new patients were seen within the desired time were often based on available appointments, rather than the patient’s clinical needs. If the patient was given an appointment two months later because of a lack of openings, the veteran would still be recorded as having been seen within two weeks of the desired date.

The report recommends that the VA revise its measurements to reflect the time veterans actually wait for mental-health care and that the VA study whether mental-health staff vacancies represent a systemic problem.

Robert Petzel, the department’s undersecretary for health, concurred with the findings and said that the VHA is already making changes. The VA is developing better metrics and reporting tools to track waiting times, the department said.

Fears that the VA might face budget cuts as it deals with increasing demand for services were relieved by a White House statement Monday that the department is exempt from the threat of automatic cuts to federal spending scheduled next year.

The statement was made in a letter from the Office of Management and Budget in response to a request in March from the Government Accountability Office seeking the White House view.

The letter, from OMB deputy general counsel Steven D. Aitken, says “all programs administered by the VA, including Veterans’ Medical Care, are exempt from sequestration.”

Veterans groups had feared that programs for veterans could be cut because last year’s failure to reach a deal on reducing the federal deficit is supposed to trigger automatic cuts under a sequestration mechanism.

“Disabled veterans can breathe a sigh of relief today,” said Richard L. DeNoyer, national commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

The uncertainty had sparked criticism on Capitol Hill, where the chairman of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, Rep. Jeff Miller (R-Fla.), accused the White House of leaving veterans “twisting in the wind.”

Miller called Monday’s statement “long overdue.”

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.