The Washington Post

Mitt Romney announces far-reaching plan for jobs, economy

The far-reaching economic plan that Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney put forward on Tuesday relies heavily on the premise that reviving the economy depends on getting the government out of the way of corporations.

Romney’s prescription for the country’s ailing economy includes overhauling federal tax, regulatory, trade and energy policies. His is a collection of business-friendly ideas that fit neatly within the mainstream of the Republican Party, with a few innovative proposals sprinkled throughout, namely tougher stances on China and labor unions.

“The right answer for America is not to grow government or to believe that government can create jobs. It is instead to create the conditions that allow the private sector and entrepreneurs to create jobs and to grow our economy. Growth is the answer, not government,” Romney said as he released the plan, called “Believe in America.”

That may be a questionable concept at a time when businesses are seeing record profits but have not put them into the kind of hiring and investment that could start a national economic recovery. At the same time, though, polls show that voters are losing faith in the Obama administration and its embrace of government as a solution to many of the country’s problems.

So in many ways, the terms of engagement between the president and Romney, as well as the rest of the Republican field, are set. “The politics of contrast are pretty simple here,” conservative economist Douglas Holtz-Eakin said.

Channeling the management consultant he used to be, Romney presented the outlines of a 59-point plan, published in a 160-page book. His aides boasted that it is the most specific proposal any presidential candidate has offered.

Romney spoke without a prepared text under a banner that read, “Day One, Job One,” inside a sweltering North Las Vegas truck warehouse. He laid out 10 actions he said he would take on his first day in the Oval Office that would create more certainty for businesses.

They include five measures that would: lower the corporate tax rate to 25 percent from 35 percent; implement free-trade agreements with Colombia, Panama and South Korea; expand domestic energy exploration; consolidate worker retraining programs and turn them over to the states; and cut non-security discretionary spending by 5 percent. (President Obama supports those three trade agreements, although he has been accused of dithering to satisfy the demands of organized labor.)

If elected, the former Massachusetts governor said he would issue five executive orders on Inauguration Day. They would roll back Obama’s health-care overhaul; eliminate Obama-era regulations; issue new oil-drilling permits; reverse a number of policies that favor organized labor; and sanction China for currency manipulation.

“I’ll clamp down on the cheaters, and China’s the worst example of that,” Romney said. “We can’t have a trade war. But we can’t have a trade surrender, either.”

He said he would cut the size of the federal workforce by 10 percent through attrition, possibly by hiring only one employee for every two who leave.

Romney said his approach would boost annual economic growth by 4 percent, create 11.5 million jobs and lower the nation’s unemployment rate to 5.9 percent over four years.

That level of growth would be somewhat higher than it has been in the past few decades, in which it has averaged slightly more than 3 percent.

Although aides said that Romney’s prescriptions would add certainty to the business environment over the long term, there was little to provide an immediate jolt to an economy whose growth has been hampered by low consumer spending and an overhang of mortgage and other personal debt. It would take years for measures such as new free-trade agreements and leasing more land for oil drilling to affect economic growth.

That is a conundrum for both parties at a time when the imperative for austerity has made it nearly impossible to propose new government spending as a stimulus.

“That’s the challenge for Republicans and everybody else. We actually have to create some demand,” said Neera Tanden, a former official in the Clinton and Obama administrations who works for the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank.

Even as he touted the comprehensiveness of his plan, Romney left out some important details — such as setting personal income tax rates — that at least one of his opponents, former Utah governor Jon M. Huntsman Jr., has detailed in his own economic plan.

Huntsman’s proposal calls for eliminating taxes on capital gains and dividends, lowering the business tax rate, and instituting a tax holiday for repatriating corporate profits earned overseas. He also said he would repeal Obama’s health-care law and roll back regulations on financial firms and the environment.

Romney proposed an overhaul of the tax code, including eliminating taxes on interest, dividends and capital gains for individuals who earn less than $200,000. Over the longer run, he would explore lowering individual income tax rates and closing corporate loopholes. He also pledged to retain the George W. Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003.

In introducing his plan, Romney unleashed a blistering critique of Obama’s economic stewardship and offered himself as the only Republican presidential candidate with the management skills and business know-how to lift the country out of a long recession.

At one point, Romney held up his iPhone to castigate Obama’s economic policies as outdated. “President Obama’s strategy is a pay-phone strategy and we’re in a smartphone world,” he said. “What he’s doing is taking quarters and stuffing them into the pay phone and he can’t figure out why it isn’t working. It’s not connected anymore, Mr. President.”

The Obama campaign was quick to respond.

“Governor Romney repackaged the same old policies that helped create the economic crisis: boosting oil company profits and allowing Wall Street to write its own rules, more tax breaks for large corporations and more tax cuts for the wealthiest,” Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt said in a statement.

The president is scheduled to present his own jobs plan in a prime-time address to a joint session of Congress on Thursday.

Romney also came under fire from some of his Republican presidential rivals.

“As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney failed to create a pro-jobs environment and failed to institute many of the reforms he now claims to support,” said Mark Miner, spokesman for Texas Gov. Rick Perry.

Perry has eclipsed Romney in national polls in part by touting his record of creating jobs in the Texas, but he has not outlined a specific jobs plan of his own.

Huntsman, meanwhile, released a video advertisement, titled “#1 vs. #47,” that compares his state’s record of leading the nation in job creation under his governorship with the fact that Massachusetts ranked 47th in the country under Romney.

“Beneath all the bluster, beneath the razzle, the dazzle, numbers never lie,” the narrator says in Huntsman’s ad. “As the conservative governor of Utah, Jon Huntsman quietly, thoughtfully led Utah to leading the nation in job creation. About the same time, another governor led Massachusetts — led them close to the very bottom.”

Philip Rucker is a national political correspondent for The Washington Post, where he has reported since 2005.
Karen Tumulty is a national political correspondent for The Washington Post, where she received the 2013 Toner Prize for Excellence in Political Reporting.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is today. Get caught up on the race.
What to expect in the New Hampshire primary
The Post's Philip Bump says ...
Since he proclaimed that he'd win New Hampshire last summer, Bernie Sanders has seen a swing of about 50 points in his direction. Impressive. But not as impressive as the guy on the other side of the political aisle. Donald Trump has led the Republican field in New Hampshire for almost 200 days, and has held a lead in 51 straight live-caller polls -- every poll stretching back to last July.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
56% 41%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.