The Washington Post

Sebelius tells senators Obamacare site is operating more smoothly

Secretary Kathleen Sebelius answered questions from senators today about Obamacare. Here, Wonkblog's Sarah Kliff explains why some people's health insurance policies might get cancelled. (The Washington Post)

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius testified before a Senate committee Wednesday, telling lawmakers that while the troubled online marketplace for medical insurance isn’t entirely fixed, it is running more smoothly than it was after its launch a month ago. Sebelius received skeptical questions on the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, from Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and John Cornyn (R-Tex.), among others:

Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, who faces a tea party-backed challenger in 2014, was harsher still. “You have said the American people should hold you accountable, which is why today I repeat my request for you to resign.”

Sebelius, a former governor of the state Roberts represents, sat impassively as he spoke.

Despite the web site’s well-chronicled woes, Sebelius said it has improved dramatically since the administration launched its repair effort. Echoing testimony delivered on Monday by another administration official to a different committee, she said it is now able to process nearly 17,000 registrations an hour, with almost no errors. . . .

Republicans focused increasingly on issues of security, cost and coverage cancellations rather than the website, which Hatch said he assumed would be fixed.

Sebelius and Sen. Mike Crapo sparred after the Idaho Republican said many individuals will face far higher premiums next year when the program is in effect than they currently do.

The HHS secretary responded that the prices that insurance companies are charging are 16 percent lower than the Congressional Budget Office estimated. Crapo asked if she was saying prices would fall in 2014 compared to this year, and she conceded she was not. At the same time, she said that for the first time, the law will provide millions of Americans with government assistance in paying for insurance.

Associated Press

Obamacare has forced insurers to cancel some policies that do not meet the new law’s higher standards, and the cancellations have emboldened the law’s critics. But some of those policyholders are receiving subsidies and better coverage in exchange:

A week ago, Dianne Barrette was the poster child for the harms of health reform. Barrette is a 56-year-old Floridian who found she wouldn’t be able to keep her health insurance after Obamacare. . . .

Then The New Republic’s Jonathan Cohn called Barrette and walked through the subsidies she’d qualify for and the precise plans she might be able to get. Her response? “I would jump at it,” she told Cohn. “With my age, things can happen. I don’t want to have bills that could make me bankrupt. I don’t want to lose my house.”

“Maybe,” she said abut Obamacare, “it’s a blessing in disguise.”

In the space of about a week, in other words, Barrette went from Obamacare victim to Obamacare beneficiary.

Call this the fog of health reform: We’re in a period right now where the information coming out about the insurance people will get under Obamacare is often incomplete, wrong, or misleading.

Ezra Klein

The problems of the online insurance exchange are partly a result of the fact that many more states than expected did not build their own marketplaces:

In the lead up to October, it wasn’t clear that this extra workload would be a huge factor. There were arguments about whether the federal government’s work could be easily scaled. If you’re building one insurance marketplace, the thinking would go, its easy enough to plop that model down in any state where the feds are running the show.

In terms of the Web site’s consumer facing design, this worked: Each state on the federal marketplace uses the same homepage for The application process looks the same, whether you’re buying coverage in Alaska or Wyoming.

But behind the scenes, the war room notes paint a completely different narrative, where each state’s idiosyncratic issues didn’t lend themselves to scale. Alaska and Wyoming, in other words, had totally different problems — ones that couldn’t be addressed with a singular fix.

Sarah Kliff

Opinion writer Dana Milbank writes that President Obama made the mistake of working only with people he knew and trusted in implementing the law, rather than seeking the most qualified people:

Like his predecessor, he has rewarded loyalty and surrounded himself with like-minded advisers disinclined to dissent. This, combined with a Bush-like fetish for secrecy, has left the president in a bubble, struggling to find support in Congress or among the public.

That’s what makes the Iraq comparison resonate, even without Obama’s call for a technology “surge” to inviting the comparison. Although the policies are entirely different, both were unforced errors aggravated by a president’s insularity. Both men failed to hear warnings (about the intelligence and the military plan, in Bush’s case; about problems with the exchanges and the Web site, in Obama’s), overstated their cases (Bush’s hysteria about Iraq’s nuclear program; Obama’s keep-your-plan promise) and used the other side’s partisanship as an excuse to withhold information.

One of those who has made the Iraq comparison, National Journal’s Ron Fournier, argues that Obama “needs to do some soul-searching. What did I miss, and why? What was kept from me, and why?”

Bush didn’t ask those questions until his presidency was nearly over. Obama still has some time to cure the ills of insularity.

Dana Milbank

The administration has a stated goal of completing its work on the Web site by the end of this month.

Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) took issue with the Obama administration's vow that Americans could keep their health care plans under Obamacare in an exchanged with HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius Wednesday. (The Washington Post)
Max Ehrenfreund writes for Wonkblog and compiles Wonkbook, a daily policy newsletter. You can subscribe here. Before joining The Washington Post, Ehrenfreund wrote for the Washington Monthly and The Sacramento Bee.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
Republicans debate tonight. The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
Justice Scalia, in his own words
The Fix asks The State's political reporter where the most important region of the state is.
The State's Andy Shain says he could talk about Charleston, which represents a little bit of everything the state has to offer from evangelicals to libertarians, and where Ted Cruz is raising more money than anywhere else. In a twist, Marco Rubio is drawing strong financial support from more socially conservative Upstate. That said, Donald Trump is bursting all the conventional wisdom in the state. So maybe the better answer to this question is, "Wherever Trump is."
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.