The Washington Post

Senators clash over border security proposals in immigration bill

Senators clashed Thursday over proposals to secure the U.S.-Mexico border contained in a comprehensive immigration reform bill, revealing divisions between Republicans and Democrats that could determine the fate of the most sweeping overhaul of the nation’s border laws in nearly three decades.

On the first day of debate over amendments, senators on the Judiciary Committee zeroed in on how well the 844-page legislation, developed by a bipartisan group of eight senators, is able to stem illegal immigration along the Southwest border.

As the debate began, several Republicans lobbied for a change to the bill, proposed by Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), that would require federal law enforcement authorities to establish operational control of the entire border for six months before allowing any of the country’s 11 million undocumented immigrants to earn legal status.

Democrats objected to the provisions, arguing that the bill already includes significant new border control measures and that the additional requirements would delay for too long the ability for illegal immigrants to earn green cards and citizenship.

“This is a confidence-building measure,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.), who supported the amendment. “Border security, if it does not work as advertised, we would have failed in our responsibility to solve the problem.”

Democrats on the committee, along with two Republican allies who participated in developing the legislation, countered that the federal government has invested record amounts of money and manpower on border enforcement, helping to reduce the amount of people trying to cross illegally.

Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) noted the government spent $18 billion on border security in 2011.

“That’s more than we spend on all other federal law enforcement combined,” he said.

The committee rejected the Grassley amendment by a vote of 12-6, with all 10 Democrats and two Republicans rejecting it. But the debate foreshadowed potential problems for the comprehensive bill as it makes its way through the Senate and, potentially, the GOP-controlled House.

Many Republicans have said they will not support a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants unless they are convinced the border is fully secured.

The committee meeting Thursday marked the first of what is expected to be several days of hearings on amendments over the next three weeks. Senators have filed 300 potential changes to the bill.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a member of the bipartisan group who is not on the Judiciary Committee, has said that the legislation will not pass the Senate or House without changes to the border control provisions.

“I want to know how the bill doesn’t repeat mistakes we’ve made in the past,” said Grassley, the ranking Republican on the committee who has been skeptical about parts of the legislation. “Since we only do comprehensive immigration reform about once every 25 years, or at least successfully so, we have to get it right . . . so that we don’t have to revisit this issue again.”

The amendments to the border provisions include requiring more reports by federal agencies, adding a second layer of fencing, requiring more border agents and giving Congress more authority over the federal implementation of border control plans.

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), a member of the bipartisan group, called the bill a fair one that represented compromises on all sides. As the committee began its meeting, Schumer said: “Don’t make an effort to kill a bill that is the best hope for immigration reform we’ve had in the country, and the best hope to break the partisan gridlock that has strangled the Senate, the Congress and the country.”

The Judiciary Committee will consider amendments to other portions of the bill at additional hearings scheduled for next week. The panel’s chairman, Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), has said he intends to hold a committee vote by early next month in hopes of sending the bill to the full Senate in early summer.

The House is weighing whether to consider a comprehensive bill or break it into smaller pieces, a tactic opposed by Democrats and the Obama administration.

Discuss this topic and other political issues in the politics discussion forums.

David Nakamura covers the White House. He has previously covered sports, education and city government and reported from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Japan.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
Republicans debated Saturday night. The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says...
Rarely has the division between Trump and party elites been more apparent. Trump trashed one of the most revered families in Republican politics and made a bet that standing his ground is better than backing down. Drawing boos from the audience, Trump did not flinch. But whether he will be punished or rewarded by voters was the unanswerable question.
GOP candidates react to Justice Scalia's death
I don't know how he knows what I said on Univision because he doesn't speak Spanish.
Sen. Marco Rubio, attacking Sen. Ted Cruz in Saturday night's very heated GOP debate in South Carolina. Soon after, Cruz went on a tirade in Spanish.
The Fix asks The State's political reporter where the most important region of the state is.
The State's Andy Shain says he could talk about Charleston, which represents a little bit of everything the state has to offer from evangelicals to libertarians, and where Ted Cruz is raising more money than anywhere else. In a twist, Marco Rubio is drawing strong financial support from more socially conservative Upstate. That said, Donald Trump is bursting all the conventional wisdom in the state. So maybe the better answer to this question is, "Wherever Trump is."
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

March 6: Democratic debate

on CNN, in Flint, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.