The Washington Post

Senate panel examines contractor spending


While federal employee compensation has become a high-value target for congressional Republicans, the cost of federal contractors has received much less notice.

“Spending on service contractors has outpaced spending on federal employees,” said Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) as she opened a hearing Thursday of the ad hoc subcommittee on contracting. “The cost of service contracts has increased by 44 percent over the last 10 years, from $181 billion to $324 billion, while in the same time period, spending on federal employees has increased by 34 percent, from $170 billion to $229 billion.”

Joe Davidson writes the Federal Diary, a column about federal government and workplace issues that celebrated its 80th birthday in November 2012. Davidson previously was an assistant city editor at The Washington Post and a Washington and foreign correspondent with The Wall Street Journal, where he covered federal agencies and political campaigns. View Archive

McCaskill praised bipartisan legislation offered by Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) that would cap the amount the federal government reimburses individual contract employees at $400,000. A bill by Rep. Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.) would limit such reimbursement to $200,000. Currently, Uncle Sam is allowed to pay $693,000 to individual contractors, who might be paid additional sums by their companies.

Service contractors do a wide range of government work, often in the same space as federal staffers, but without the same restrictions on pay.

McCaskill lamented the paucity of data comparing the costs of contractors and employees. A September report by the nonprofit Project on Government Oversight (POGO) did make some comparisons and found, McCaskill said, “that in some instances, contractors may be paid, on average, more than 1.83 times what federal employees are paid to perform the same work.”

The report, “Bad Business: Billions of Taxpayer Dollars Wasted on Hiring Contractors,” also said:

●“Federal government employees were less expensive than contractors in 33 of the 35 occupational classifications POGO reviewed.”

●“In one instance, contractor billing rates were nearly 5 times more than the full compensation paid to federal employees performing comparable services.”

●“The federal government has failed to determine how much money it saves or wastes by outsourcing, insourcing, or retaining services, and has no system for doing so.”

The Professional Services Council, a trade association representing contractors, urged caution in moving government work from the private sector to federal agencies: “While we recognize that there are clear limits to the scope of work that is appropriate for the private sector to perform for the government, it is also true that the innovation, skills, agility, and competitive spirit of the private sector are the engine that drives our economy,” Stan Soloway, the association’s president, said in a news release. “Any decision to perform work inside the government that is appropriate for the private sector to do must be accompanied by real analytical rigor. To do otherwise is contrary to both the government’s and taxpayers’ interests and the broader health of our economy.”

McCaskill cited the Department of Homeland Security’s Balanced Workforce Strategy as “a promising approach to making contracting decisions.”

One of the goals of that strategy is to “determine the proper balance of federal employees and contractors,” said Debra Tomchek, executive director of the department’s Balanced Workforce Program Management Office. The strategy follows a three-step process: identifying the work, analyzing the work and deciding who does the work.

When an office “determines that either federal employees or contractors would be suitable to perform a function, they must consider and compare the costs of each, which informs the final decision on the most cost-effective and efficient source of support,” Tomchek said.

McCaskill chided colleagues for “assuming that contractors cost less and that federal employees cost more.” She said that “doesn’t help this discussion, because frankly we don’t have any idea whether that assumption is true or false.”

She is supportive of Obama administration efforts to hold down contractor spending, although she said the Office of Management and Budget needs to provide more guidance in that area. Moira K. Mack, an agency spokeswoman, said OMB is working “expeditiously on guidance that will provide additional assistance” to agencies.

Under President Obama, Mack said, “agencies put an end to the unsustainable growth in contracting experienced during the last administration, and, for the first time in a long time, overall contract spending declined or stayed flat two years in a row.”

Previous columns by Joe Davidson are available at Follow the Federal Diary on Twitter: @JoeDavidsonWP

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says ...
This was supposed to be the strongest Republican presidential field in memory, but cracks are showing. At Saturday night's debate, Marco Rubio withered in the face of unyielding attacks from Chris Christie, drawing attention to the biggest question about his candidacy: Is he ready to be president? How much the debate will affect Rubio's standing Tuesday is anybody's guess. But even if he does well, the question about his readiness to serve as president and to go up against Clinton, if she is the Democratic nominee, will linger.
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Play Video
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.