The Washington Post

Shirley Sherrod defamation case faces blogger free-speech challenge

A colleague of the late conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart is asking a federal appeals court to throw out a defamation case brought against him by former government employee Shirley Sherrod, saying the lawsuit violates the blogger’s right to freedom of speech.

Sherrod was ousted from her job as an Agriculture Department rural-development official in 2010 after Breitbart posted an edited video of Sherrod, who is black, supposedly making racist remarks. She sued Breitbart, his employee Larry O’Connor and an unnamed defendant for defamation and emotional distress after USDA officials asked her to resign and the video ignited a racial firestorm. Sherrod’s attorneys say the unnamed defendant is the person whom they believe passed the video on to Breitbart, though the person’s identity remains unknown.

Breitbart died unexpectedly a year ago, and his status in the case is unclear; his family does not appear to have notified the court of an estate that can be sued.

The case argued before the court of appeals Friday is one of the first high-profile federal lawsuits to test the free-speech rights of bloggers.

Backed by large news organizations including the The Washington Post Co., the New York Times and Dow Jones & Co., which have filed friend-of-the-court briefs in the case, O’Connor’s attorneys argued to have the case dismissed under a D.C. statute that aims to prevent the silencing of critics through lawsuits. A federal district judge rejected their motion to dismiss, citing timing and jurisdictional issues, prompting the appeal.

The lawyers told the appeals court that O’Connor and Breitbart, before he died, stood by the content, asserting that the blog post was opinion.

“What happened here is what happens in journalism every day,” said Bruce Brown, an attorney for O’Connor.

Sherrod’s attorneys said dismissal under the D.C. statute would violate her right to a trial.

The video on Breitbart’s Web site turned out to be edited, and when Sherrod’s full speech to an NAACP group earlier that year came to light, it became clear that her remarks about an initial reluctance to help a white farmer decades ago were not racist but rather an attempt at telling a story of racial reconciliation. Sherrod received public apologies from the administration — including one from President Obama — and an offer to return to her job, which she declined.

Sherrod’s 2011 lawsuit says the incident affected her sleep and caused her back pain. It contends that she was damaged by having her “integrity, impartiality and motivations questioned, making it difficult (if not impossible) for her to continue her life’s work assisting poor farmers in rural areas” even though she was invited to return to the department.

The video was posted amid ongoing friction between the NAACP and the tea party movement, each accusing the other of having racist elements in their ranks. Breitbart said at the time that the video showed the NAACP condoning racist comments from a government official.

The full video, however, showed Sherrod explaining to an audience how she eventually became friends with the farmer and helped him save his land from foreclosure.

Brown, O’Connor’s attorney, defended the bloggers’ actions and said the suit should be dismissed under the District’s anti-SLAPP [strategic lawsuits against public participation] law, because Breitbart’s posting was an opinion. “She was a public official who saw the world through a racial prism,” Brown said of Sherrod.

The case has been closely watched as a test of the anti-SLAPP statute.

Brown asked the three judges to consider the precedent this case would have.

“It is in courts like this where First Amendment law is made,” he said.

— Associated Press

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says ...
This was supposed to be the strongest Republican presidential field in memory, but cracks are showing. At Saturday night's debate, Marco Rubio withered in the face of unyielding attacks from Chris Christie, drawing attention to the biggest question about his candidacy: Is he ready to be president? How much the debate will affect Rubio's standing Tuesday is anybody's guess. But even if he does well, the question about his readiness to serve as president and to go up against Clinton, if she is the Democratic nominee, will linger.
Listen
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Listen
Play Video
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.