The Washington Post

The Influence Industry: IRS says it will consider changes to nonprofit politics rules

Campaign watchdog groups see a glimmer of hope in a new letter from the Internal Revenue Service, which suggests that the agency might consider changes to the rules governing tax exemptions for politically active groups.

Some tax experts, however, aren’t so sure that any reforms are in the offing.

Deputy Editor, National Politics View Archive

Good-government types have complained for years that many nonprofit groups are gaming the system by posing as “social welfare” organizations while, in fact, acting more like political committees focused on influencing elections.

The distinction, which means the groups do not have to disclose their donors, has gained particular prominence since the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that corporations and unions could spend unlimited money on elections.

The 2010 decision has contributed to a flood of money for groups such as the conservative Crossroads GPS and liberal Priorities USA that fund political ads and activities but do not have to disclose their donors. The key distinction for the IRS is whether politics is a group’s “primary purpose,” which has come to be sketchily defined as 50 percent or more of a group’s budget.

In July last year, the Campaign Legal Center and Democracy 21 watchdog groups submitted a petition challenging the IRS regulations, calling them overbroad and in defiance of congressional intent and court rulings. Nearly a year later, on July 17, the IRS responded with a three-paragraph letter suggesting that the agency might consider reviewing its rules.

“The IRS is aware of the current public interest in this issue,” wrote Lois G. Lerner, director of exempt organizations at the IRS. “These regulations have been in place since 1959. We will consider proposed changes in this area as we work with the IRS Office of Chief Counsel and the Treasury Department’s Office of Tax Policy to identify tax issues that should be addressed through regulations and other published guidance.”

Watchdog groups view the letter as an important step forward in the push for greater disclosure of political contributions.

“This could be a major breakthrough in the effort to close down massive amounts of secret money that is flowing into federal elections through groups claiming to be” nonprofits, said Democracy 21 President Fred Wertheimer.

But lawyer Marcus S. Owens of Caplin & Drysdale, who served for a decade as head of the IRS’s tax exemptions unit, said he thinks the letter “stands for a lot less” than the watchdog groups hope, in part because the IRS is not the final arbiter.

“The Treasury Department is the driver with regard to regulations and similar formal guidance, so any statement that is actually intended to reflect a real regulations project would more likely come from Treasury, not the IRS,” Owens said.

The IRS, which stays mum on internal deliberations, has appeared reticent to take action on nonprofit groups for fear of being accused of political motives. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has accused the Obama administration of “intimidation” of conservative groups, alleging among other things that the IRS was targeting tea party organizations.

The disclosure issue has become a central part of the 2012 elections, with President Obama and other Democrats loudly complaining about the extent to which secret money is funding many political ads. Senate Democrats were blocked by Republicans this month in their attempt to impose disclosure requirements on many politically active nonprofit groups.

Donations by text

Political contributions by text message are not happening as quickly as boosters hoped.

Last month, the FEC unanimously decided that Obama, Republican challenger Mitt Romney and other federal candidates could immediately begin collecting contributions through text-messaging services. The decision would allow candidates to solicit small-dollar donations in much the same way that charities collect money for disaster relief.

But now several major wireless carriers are balking at the idea, worried that they might be held liable if an illegal donation slipped through from a foreign citizen or otherwise improper donor. CTIA-The Wireless Association, which represents major carriers such as Verizon and AT&T, has asked the FEC for clarification — a request that could push any final resolution close to or past the election.

The two political consulting firms that initiated the texting idea, Democratic-aligned Armour Media and GOP firm m-Qube, say the carriers should have nothing to worry about. The companies, joined by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.), are asking for their own clarification from the FEC by mid-August in a bid to speed things along.

So it’s still possible that campaign supporters might be hit up for donations-by-text before the November election. Stay tuned.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is today. Get caught up on the race.
What to expect in the New Hampshire primary
The Post's Philip Bump says ...
Since he proclaimed that he'd win New Hampshire last summer, Bernie Sanders has seen a swing of about 50 points in his direction. Impressive. But not as impressive as the guy on the other side of the political aisle. Donald Trump has led the Republican field in New Hampshire for almost 200 days, and has held a lead in 51 straight live-caller polls -- every poll stretching back to last July.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the state.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont.
56% 41%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.