The Washington Post

Why Republicans shouldn’t wait to pass immigration reform


A betting man, which The Fix is most definitely not, would say that the odds of some sort of immigration reform measure passing before the 2014 elections are decidedly less than 50-50 after a week when both Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker John A. Boehner talked down the idea.

The logic is simple: The Republican base — a.k.a. the voters the party badly needs in order to win back the Senate and hold the House in November — doesn’t like the idea of providing the 11 million illegal immigrants in the United States with a path to legalization or, especially, citizenship. Those in the base also don’t believe that the Obama administration is up to the task of enforcing more-stringent border security measures, even if Congress passes some.

Chris Cillizza writes “The Fix,” a politics blog for the Washington Post. He also covers the White House. View Archive

Given how few Republican members of Congress represent competitive districts with sizable Hispanic populations — there are only four House districts Republicans hold that have a Hispanic population of 25 percent or more and were carried by President Obama in 2012 — and the strong feelings against reform within the party base, it’s not hard to see why McConnell (R-Ky.) and Boehner (R-Ohio) have cooled on the idea of passing immigration reform before the midterms.

And yet, there is a political case to be made that now — not 2015, 2016 or some other uncertain date in the future — is the time for Republicans to pass immigration reform. Let’s walk through the evidence.

1.) No, the Republican base doesn’t like comprehensive (or even semi-comprehensive) immigration reform. But guess what it likes less? Obama and the Affordable Care Act. In a late January Washington Post-ABC News poll, 89 percent of Republicans disapproved of how the president had handled the implementation of the health-care law. Even more amazing? Seventy-nine percent strongly disapproved, a remarkable testament to how much passion the law stirs up in the GOP base.

It’s hard to imagine anything short of comprehensive immigration reform with a path to citizenship causing a major diminishment in Republican-base intensity surrounding Obama and his health-care law. “Assuming Obamacare is still law and President Obama is still in office this November, our people are coming out,” said one Republican strategist supportive of immigration reform.

2.) The idea that it would be better — and more politically savvy — to wait until 2015 to tackle immigration reform overlooks one thing: By early 2015, the 2016 presidential race will already be underway. And there are at least three Republican senators — Rand Paul (Ky.), Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Ted Cruz (Tex.) — who are near-certain candidates.

Anyone who thinks immigration reform is possible under those circumstances needs only to remember the 2012 presidential race, when, desperate to prove his conservative credentials, Mitt Romney promoted a policy of “self-deportation” to handle the country’s millions of illegal immigrants. He went on to win a measly 27 percent of Hispanic voters in the general election.

If the worry is that passing immigration reform now would anger the party’s base, can you imagine the pressure on the likes of Rubio — or Govs. Chris Christie (N.J.) or Scott Walker (Wis.) — to play to the base on the issue in 2016?

3.) It’s hard to see Republicans winning a presidential election in the coming years without making inroads into the Hispanic community. Consider this: Romney won the white vote by 20 percentage points, carried independent voters by five points and won voters who said the economy was the most important issue by four points. And he still lost to Obama by 126 electoral votes.

Combine the shrinking white vote — it declined as a share of the overall electorate again in 2012 — with the boom in the Hispanic population, and it becomes quite clear that Democratic lean is a demographic problem that is only going to get worse for Republicans. That is, unless the party can find a way to be competitive — or at least a whole heck of a lot more competitive than Romney — among Latinos.

While even the most pro-immigration-reform Republican strategists admit that simply passing some sort of overhaul won’t solve the party’s problem with Hispanics, they believe it is sine qua non when it comes to courting those voters. As in, if immigration reform doesn’t pass with some Republican help, there will be no chance for the party to make its argument to Latinos on social or fiscal policy. They just won’t be listening.

If you believe those are the stakes, then it might be worth trying to pass immigration reform, even if it could cost you a chance to retake the Senate in November.

All of the above doesn’t change the political reality that immigration reform had — and has — a very narrow window to be passed in the 113th Congress. Short-term calculations almost always trump longer-term ones; the “what’s good for me” view is almost always more persuasive than the “what’s good for the party” view.

But there is a political case that the GOP needs to get immigration reform done now. The question is whether it will convince any of the Republicans sitting in Congress.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
Republicans debated Saturday night. The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says...
Rarely has the division between Trump and party elites been more apparent. Trump trashed one of the most revered families in Republican politics and made a bet that standing his ground is better than backing down. Drawing boos from the audience, Trump did not flinch. But whether he will be punished or rewarded by voters was the unanswerable question.
GOP candidates react to Justice Scalia's death
I don't know how he knows what I said on Univision because he doesn't speak Spanish.
Sen. Marco Rubio, attacking Sen. Ted Cruz in Saturday night's very heated GOP debate in South Carolina. Soon after, Cruz went on a tirade in Spanish.
The Fix asks The State's political reporter where the most important region of the state is.
The State's Andy Shain says he could talk about Charleston, which represents a little bit of everything the state has to offer from evangelicals to libertarians, and where Ted Cruz is raising more money than anywhere else. In a twist, Marco Rubio is drawing strong financial support from more socially conservative Upstate. That said, Donald Trump is bursting all the conventional wisdom in the state. So maybe the better answer to this question is, "Wherever Trump is."
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
67% 22%
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

March 6: Democratic debate

on CNN, in Flint, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.