The Washington Post

U.S. Argues Against Return Of Excerpts of Nixon Tapes

The Justice Department has told an appellate court here that the government is required by law to maintain the integrity of President Richard M. Nixon’s White House tapes and that it has no obligation to cut out portions of them to satisfy the demands of Nixon’s estate.

A federal court here has ordered the National Archives to return all “personal or private conversations” on the original tapes to the late president’s estate “forthwith.” In an appeal brief filed late last Wednesday, however, lawyers at Justice said this would jeopardize “virtually all” of the 950 reels of tape from the Nixon presidency that Congress confiscated by law in 1974 to keep Nixon from destroying them.

The stated purpose of the bill that became the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act of 1974, the 44-page brief said, was “to protect and preserve tape recordings involving former President Richard M. Nixon and made during his tenure.” A provision of the law explicitly directs the archivist of the United States to protect the recordings “from loss or destruction.”

At issue are 820 hours of private or personal conversations scattered throughout the 4,000 hours recorded on Nixon’s sound-activated taping system from 1971 to 1973, when the setup was disclosed during Senate hearings on the Watergate scandals.

Nixon lawyers contend the private portions of the originals must be returned to them under a section of the 1974 law calling for adoption of regulations providing for public access to the tapes but respecting “the need” to give Nixon or his heirs “sole custody and use” of the personal segments.

Citing government experts who said the originals are too fragile to be cut up without permanent damage, the Justice lawyers said the “sole custody” exception applies only to the rules for public access and does not override the duty imposed on the archivist to protect the originals.

The 1974 law also states that none of the tapes shall be destroyed “except as hereafter may be provided by law.” But the brief maintained that Congress was talking about a future law, and “no such later law” was ever enacted. Nixon’s privacy interests, the brief said, will be preserved because the original tapes will be kept intact in a special vault, without any provision for public access.

A hearing is scheduled for late February. Nixon lawyers contend that the originals can be safely spliced and that, in any case, the Archives will retain enhanced copies that can be safely edited “without the loss of a single second of the nonprivate conversations.”

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Democrats debated Thursday night. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Chris Cillizza on the Democratic debate...
On Clinton: She poked a series of holes in Sanders's health-care proposal and broadly cast him as someone who talks a big game but simply can't hope to achieve his goals.

On Sanders: If the challenge was to show that he could be a candidate for people other than those who already love him, he didn't make much progress toward that goal. But he did come across as more well-versed on foreign policy than in debates past.
The PBS debate in 3 minutes
Quoted
We are in vigorous agreement here.
Hillary Clinton, during the PBS Democratic debate, a night in which she and Sanders shared many of the same positions on issues
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the polls as he faces rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz heading into the S.C. GOP primary on Feb. 20.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
Fact Checker
Trump’s claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion
The billionaire's claim is highly dubious. Based on the costs of the Israeli security barrier (which is mostly fence) and the cost of the relatively simple fence already along the U.S.-Mexico border, an $8 billion price tag is simply not credible.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read

politics

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.