The Washington Post

White House issues new rules to cut bureaucratic red tape

The Obama administration released final plans Tuesday to streamline the federal bu­reaucracy by eliminating hundreds of regulatory requirements across two dozen agencies, an overhaul that officials said could save $10 billion over five years.

Administration officials hailed the reforms, which came in response to President Obama’s January decree to cut red tape, as a way to spur job creation by freeing businesses from burdensome rules that hindered growth.

As if to underscore the density of the federal bureaucracy, the plans were outlined in a report spanning 800 pages, detailing the elimination or revision of more than 500 regulations. Yet the report did not address major new regulations that are being implemented to deal with the Wall Street meltdown and landmark health-care legislation. And White House officials were unwilling to speculate about how many jobs could be created by the effort.

The report was quickly criticized by business leaders, who said the administration did not go far enough, and consumer advocates, who feared the erosion of key health, safety and environmental protections.

The changes “will not have a material impact on the real regulatory burdens facing businesses today,” Bill Kovacs, senior vice president at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said in a statement.

But Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, a non­profit lobbying group, said the White House appeared eager to curry political favor of big business at the expense of consumers.

“It’s worrisome because it suggests the White House is going to ease up on enforcement and slow down on health, safety and environmental protections,” Weissman said.

Cass Sunstein, administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, defended the effort to eliminate redundant and unnecessary rules by highlighting the potential cost savings.

The Transportation Department alone is planning to revise 100 regulations, including railroad industry rules that could save $340 million, Sunstein said. He added that consumers will benefit: The State Department is making it easier for low-risk tourists to get visas to the United States, and the Defense Department is revising rules to allow 60,000 contractors to be paid more quickly.

The savings are “a pretty big deal,” Sunstein said in a conference call with reporters. “But numbers do not tell the whole story. There are a number of initiatives that . . . will make a difference to people.”

Even as the Obama administration hailed the plans to streamline red tape, it has enacted new regulations. Several weeks ago, for example, the administration announced the first fuel-efficiency standards for heavy-duty trucks and buses.

Sunstein said his office has directed agencies to consider the balance between “costs and benefits” when considering new rules.

“Every plan emphasizes that it is not a one-shot endeavor,” he said. “We have made an effort to create periodic reviews of rules and to change the culture and be open to public concerns.”

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) called the new plans “underwhelming” and said Obama “seems reluctant to do everything in his power” to help business owners.

In the end, the White House was unable to please either the business leaders it was courting or progressives, who are “disappointed at the whole exercise,” said Rena Steinzor, president of the liberal think tank Center for Progressive Reform.

The reforms “fall far short of their obvious goal: to placate greedy and intemperate industry demands that major rules be cancelled,” Steinzor, a law professor at the University of Maryland, wrote in a blog post Tuesday. “And they distress public interest advocates.”

David Nakamura covers the White House. He has previously covered sports, education and city government and reported from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Japan.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is today. Get caught up on the race.
What to expect in the New Hampshire primary
The Post's Philip Bump says ...
Since he proclaimed that he'd win New Hampshire last summer, Bernie Sanders has seen a swing of about 50 points in his direction. Impressive. But not as impressive as the guy on the other side of the political aisle. Donald Trump has led the Republican field in New Hampshire for almost 200 days, and has held a lead in 51 straight live-caller polls -- every poll stretching back to last July.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the state.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont.
56% 41%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.