The Washington Post

White House tries to rally congressional Democrats in support of Obamacare

Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly described the tax penalty that Americans will face if they fail to sign up for coverage by March 31. The penalty is not necessarily $95; it is either $95 or 1 percent of their adjusted gross income, whichever is greater. This version has been updated.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W-Va.), pictured, is working with Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) to press for a one-year delay in the individual mandate that Americans buy insurance or pay a $95 penalty. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

By the time President Obama acknowledged a week ago Monday that his signature health-care program had serious problems, it was clear that the political stakes had escalated for the White House.

And so that evening, Obama gathered some of the top political advisers from his first term for a strategy session on a range of topics. The president himself spent little time on how to handle the political fallout, arguing that fixing the problems of, the Web site at the heart of the troubles, would take care of that challenge.

Not everyone agreed that it was so simple.

In a separate huddle that night, without the president, some of the former aides — including David Plouffe, Robert Gibbs and David Axelrod from Obama’s original political brain trust — advanced a different argument to deal with what they saw as a looming threat.

Comparing the situation at one point to the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, they warned senior staffers that without a strategy shift — one that involved providing as much information as possible to both Capitol Hill and the news media — they would risk defections by crucial Democratic lawmakers facing reelection in 2014. Keeping the administration’s allies on board was critical to saving the broader program, so maintaining Democratic cohesion represented a key first step.

A look at the consumer's route through the website and the potential failure points.

By the end of the week, the administration had markedly shifted its approach, opening up more about details of the problems and holding regular news briefings in which officials identified a deadline for fixing the Web site and the contractor in charge of overseeing the work. They delivered private briefings to Senate staffers and House members, while White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough called key senators to update them.

The belated turnabout underscored how the White House — which had spent the first two weeks of the rollout focused on reopening the government and averting a debt ceiling crisis and a third week trying to deflect questions as they enlisted help to fix the system — has been forced to scramble to fend off a backdoor assault from Democrats on the president’s signature legislative achievement.

With sparse information about the Web site’s problems at the outset, senior administration officials are now working to repair fissures in a party that managed to present a united front until last week.

“The stakes are high because of the politics of it,” said Rep. Gerald E. Connolly (D-Va.), a White House ally who has criticized the contracting process. “I think the White House understands that it’s important to have transparency, so we’re not unnecessarily eroding confidence in the program.”

For three weeks, the administration provided few details about the enrollment system’s operations, including what went wrong and how many consumers were able to enroll. It is still not releasing enrollment figures or saying who specifically is repairing the site. But on Friday, Jeff Zients — the former Obama budget official brought in by the White House to oversee the effort — assured reporters that it would be functioning smoothly by the end of November.

“It’s going to take a lot of work and some time, but there is a clear path forward,” Zients said.

Even as the administration launched a more robust defense of the federal health insurance marketplace — dispatching staffers to Capitol Hill for closed-door briefings and firing off memos to lawmakers’ offices with the underlined talking point, “The website is fixable” — some jittery Democrats were pressing for changes to the system.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) and nine other Democrats — four of whom are facing tough reelection fights in conservative states — asked Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Friday to extend the program’s enrollment period beyond March 31 to ensure that Americans aren’t penalized for failing to sign up for insurance by then.

Separately, Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) is working with Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) to press for a one-year delay in the individual mandate, which requires that Americans obtain insurance, or they will either have to pay a $95 penalty or 1 percent of their adjusted gross income, whichever is greater.

“All we’re postponing is the crime and a fine,” Manchin said in an interview Thursday. “I’m not giving up. You have to make it better.”

But these proposals could undermine the basis on which insurers made their premium estimates, jeopardizing the overall system.

Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for America’s Health Insurance Plans, said insurers were comfortable with the administration’s decision Wednesday night to waive the penalty for any American who signs up for insurance by March 31, because “that is consistent with what health plans assumed with their premium rates for next year.”

“But delaying the individual mandate or extending the enrollment period, going beyond that, would be problematic and could be destabilizing for insurance markets,” Zirkelbach added.

Earlier this month, HHS officials said taxpayers would pay a portion of the penalty if they did not register by Feb. 15, so their plans could kick in by March 1. But as Shaheen and others pressed to extend enrollment given the glitches, the White House said it would issue guidance exempting consumers from any penalty as long as they signed up for insurance by the end of March.

White House communications director Jennifer Palmieri said in an interview Friday that she and other officials understand lawmakers’ impatience to devise a policy solution, adding that talk of changing the enrollment period was considered “definitely premature.”

“We’re really unhappy. We understand people on the Hill are unhappy, and we want them to be as up to speed as possible, ” Palmieri said. “We’re in a better position to do that today than we were a few days ago.”

Unlike in other controversies, in which the White House has held conference calls with progressive groups and dispatched former aides to appear on television shows with talking points, Obama and his deputies have largely managed this issue on their own.

Some liberal groups are working to defend the law without the White House’s orchestration. Last week, for example, the advocacy group American Bridge 21st Century provided opposition research to House Energy and Commerce Committee Democrats before Thursday’s hearing on the law. Acting without White House input, the group also issued a rapid response video as soon as the hearing ended, and it plans a to use a similar strategy this week for two House hearings featuring administration officials, according to an individual familiar with the matter who requested anonymity to speak about the strategy.

When the administration has reached out, it has mainly been to constituencies closely involved with the law, such as insurers and health-care advocates.

Sebelius, McDonough, senior adviser Valerie Jarrett and White House health-care adviser Chris Jennings held a call with insurance executives Oct. 18, and the three White House aides met with several insurance chief executives Wednesday. Senior HHS and White House officials are also holding regular calls with consumer advocates.

Sebelius has also reached out to individual lawmakers, including House Energy and Commerce Committee member Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), who expressed frustration at Thursday’s hearing that the same contractors who testified Sept. 10 that the system was ready to launch returned this week to explain why online enrollment had experienced a major failure.

“Neither the secretary, nor any other administration official, has explained to me why we had this failure happen,” DeGette said in an interview. But she added that she was pleased to learn from Sebelius that the administration had brought in a general contractor to oversee the fixes.

“This isn’t just a technical coding glitch for the website,” Jon Cowan, president of the centrist Democratic think tank Third Way, said in an e-mail. “The code to get all of Obamacare to work is young, healthy people signing up in large numbers through the exchanges. That’s why the most senior players in the administration are scrambling now to get on top of this.”

Juliet Eilperin is The Washington Post's White House bureau chief, covering domestic and foreign policy as well as the culture of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. She is the author of two books—one on sharks, and another on Congress, not to be confused with each other—and has worked for the Post since 1998.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.