The Trump administration announced Monday that it will press ahead with plans to promote the use of ethanol, a move that could shore up support for Republicans in the Midwest but also comes amid fierce opposition from independent oil refiners and a group of bipartisan lawmakers.

The move to direct the Environmental Protection Agency to draft a rule allowing year-round sales of E15, or fuel that is 15 percent ethanol by volume, is “directed at increasing the supply of biofuels and providing consumer choice,” a senior Trump administration official told reporters on a conference call.

President Trump, who previewed the move in April, is expected to formally announce the directive at a rally for Republican candidates in Council Bluffs, Iowa, on Tuesday, according to multiple reports. The first-in-the-nation caucus state is the country’s largest ethanol producer; it is also one of the states projected to be hardest hit by Trump’s trade wars with China and other countries.

The EPA will move forward with the formal rulemaking process, the official said, although the precise timing remains uncertain.

Currently, sales of E15 are prohibited during the summer months because of air pollution concerns. The Renewable Fuel Standard generally calls for sales to be limited to E10, meaning a blend in which predominantly corn-based ethanol comprises 10 percent of the motor fuel.

Among those pushing for the change has been the CEO of ethanol processor POET, one of at least three firms that have lobbied Vice President Pence on the issue. During the 2016 campaign, Trump also tried to win the support of Iowa voters by backing a higher ethanol mandate.

The American Petroleum Institute and others argue that higher ethanol levels can cause harm to vehicle engines. Last week, a bipartisan group of 20 senators penned a letter to Trump urging against such a move.

“We are concerned that doing so would do nothing to address the policies impacting refinery jobs, could hurt millions of consumers whose vehicles and equipment are not compatible with higher ethanol blended gasoline, and risk worsening air quality,” they wrote.

Scott Segal, a lawyer at Bracewell LLP who has represented refining interests in Washington for more than two decades, said that while the move has been long sought by the ethanol industry, E15 “certainly imposes costs on refiners.”

“The way the renewable fuels program is currently implemented — with its potential for high costs for tradable credits — already places some merchant refiners in danger,” Segal said. “Hopefully, when the administration opens the regulatory framework of the renewable fuels program, it will also have the opportunity to address the problems created by these tradable credits in an effective and durable fashion. Protecting industrial workers at refineries as well as consumers depends on it.”

Proponents argue that claims of potential damage to vehicle engines are exaggerated and that increased ethanol use will boost the economy in rural parts of the country.

The Renewable Fuels Association, a group that represents the ethanol industry, hailed the move and called the summertime ban on E15 “the result of a burdensome, decades-old regulation that offers no environmental or economic benefit whatsoever.”

“Eliminating the summertime barrier to E15 will save consumers money and reduce emissions, enhance competition, and provide a boost to the farm economy,” the group said in a statement.

Steven Mufson contributed to this report.