The FBI’s disciplinary office found that ousted deputy director Andrew McCabe lied to his boss, then-director James B. Comey, in October 2016 about having authorized the disclosure of sensitive information to a reporter, a Republican congressman whose office reviewed the findings alleged Friday.
Neither Meadows nor his spokesman responded to requests for comment.
According to Jordan, the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility determined that McCabe lied to his superiors and investigators four times: to Comey in October 2016; to FBI investigators in May 2017; and to the Office of the Inspector General twice, beginning in the summer.
In a statement, McCabe’s attorney said it was fully appropriate for the bureau’s deputy director to authorize media interaction and asserted that Comey knew about it. The attorney, Michael R. Bromwich, said emails between the two men “clearly show that Mr. McCabe advised Director Comey that he was working with colleagues at the FBI to correct inaccuracies before the stories were published, and that they remained in contact through the weekend while the interactions with the reporter continued.”
“We deeply regret being compelled to respond to this selective leaking with any comment at all,” Bromwich said, accusing Republicans of “attempting to create a false narrative” that pits Comey and McCabe against each other.
“Nevertheless, one thing is clear: Mr. McCabe never misled Director Comey. Director Comey’s memory of these interactions was equivocal and speculative, while Mr. McCabe’s recollection is clear, unequivocal and supported by documentary evidence,” Bromwich continued. “Director Comey has no specific recollection of what Mr. McCabe told him, while Mr. McCabe remembers the two discussed the article before and after its publication.”
An attorney for Comey declined to comment.
The revelation sheds new light on a matter of keen interest to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is investigating how the bureau handled its probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state. The inquiry, once complete, is expected to determine that McCabe authorized the disclosure of sensitive information to reporter Devlin Barrett, then of the Wall Street Journal. Barrett now works for The Washington Post.
Comey asked McCabe about the source of the information in Barrett’s article shortly after it was published, Jordan said.
Two days before the article was published, Comey notified congressional leaders that he was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s emails.
On Thursday, McCabe launched a GoFundMe campaign to raise money for his legal defense. As of Friday afternoon, he had raised almost $450,000. It is unclear whether McCabe will be charged with wrongdoing.
Relying on the inspector general’s findings, the FBI’s disciplinary office recommended in its report that McCabe should be fired for the media disclosures and for allegedly misleading investigators and Comey about his role in authorizing them. The disciplinary office did not weigh in on whether McCabe should face criminal liability for his actions, according to Jordan.
McCabe, who has been a frequent target of criticism from President Trump, has said his firing was politically motivated and disputes he misled anyone.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions terminated McCabe’s employment this month, about 26 hours before he would have been able to claim a full pension for an FBI career of more than two decades.
Several members of the GOP have asked Sessions to appoint a second special counsel to examine the FBI’s conduct during the Clinton email investigation and in applying for a warrant to surveil former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.
The inspector general announced this week that his office would examine the warrant application, too . Republicans argue the inspector general lacks the reach necessary to examine the matter fully.
Sessions has effectively dismissed calls for a second special counsel, announcing Thursday that U.S. attorney John W. Huber of Utah would spearhead a broader review and saying that a second special counsel was warranted only in “extraordinary circumstances.”
Jordan surmised that, eventually, Sessions would be compelled to appoint a second special counsel, saying questions about the FBI’s conduct had already caused firings of the FBI’s director and deputy director and affected the careers of several top FBI officials. “If that’s not extraordinary circumstances, I don’t know what is,” Jordan said.
Ellen Nakashima contributed to this report.