Six months after the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, where are we?
The law slashed the maximum mortgage amount qualified for interest deductions to $750,000 from $1 million; capped write-offs for state and local taxes at $10,000, (previously there was no limit); and clamped new restrictions on home-equity loans and credit lines, stripping the section on “home equity” from the federal tax code altogether.
The net effects of the changes, which were designed to raise billions of dollars in new federal revenue, were widely predicted to be negative for owners, especially in high-cost, high-tax areas of the country. These include metropolitan areas along the West and East coasts, along with dozens of pockets of high-cost neighborhoods in the Midwest, the South and the Rocky Mountain states. Late last year, some independent economists and real estate industry advocates predicted declines in home values nationwide averaging 10 percent, with potentially much higher reductions in high-price, high-tax markets. One group forecast devaluations of up to 17 percent.
Back to the original question: Where are we now? Here’s a quick update.
●The latest data from the National Association of Realtors on existing-home sales in the high-cost brackets — the segment most vulnerable to the federal tax hatchet — suggest that demand is actually up: Sales of houses priced between $500,000 and $750,000 rose by 11.9 percent in April compared with a year ago. Sales of $750,000 to $1 million homes jumped by 16.8 percent, and those above $1 million increased by 26.7 percent. That’s frothy.
●New research by analytics and data company CoreLogic found that overall demand for homes is stable or up slightly in the 500 highest-cost, highest-tax Zip codes compared with all other Zip codes. During the first three months of 2018, loan-application demand in high-cost, high-tax areas actually exceeded levels of the previous four years.
●The dollar amounts of home equity line of credit authorizations by lenders during the first three months of 2018 are “running at the same pace” as 2017, according to Frank Nothaft, CoreLogic’s chief economist. This is despite the tax law’s elimination of interest write-offs on new home-equity borrowings that are not used to renovate, buy or build a house, effective Jan. 1, 2018.
●Home-equity growth and prices overall are soaring. Homeowners saw their equity holdings surge by $1.01 trillion from the first quarter of 2017 to the same period this year. Owners nationwide gained an average $16,300 in equity for the year and presumably far more in expensive, fast-appreciating neighborhoods. Zillow’s Real Estate Market Report issued in May found that median home values nationwide are up 8.7 percent for the year, the fastest pace in 12 years. In Seattle, values are up 13.6 percent; in Las Vegas, 16.5 percent; and in San Jose, 26 percent.
Realty agents in some of the highest-cost areas say the tax bill is a non-subject among affluent buyers and sellers. Jeff Dowler of Solutions Real Estate in Carlsbad, Calif., told me, “I haven’t heard anything from clients or potential buyers. The market is actually very strong, and demand hasn’t changed” since the tax law’s enactment. Anthony Lamacchia, broker-owner of Lamacchia Realty in the Boston area, agrees. He said his “gut” sense is that there has been “no difference” after the tax law. But Alexis Eldorrado of Eldorrado Chicago Real Estate said he believes the new law could be contributing to an increase of inventory in the upper brackets. Exceptionally high property and income taxes, capped as deductions at just $10,000 a year, are prompting owners to want to sell in rising numbers.
What to make of all this? It’s still early to be definitive about the long-term impacts of the tax law. Other, possibly short-term macroeconomic factors may be overwhelming the real estate tax changes: record-low unemployment, rising incomes and record-low inventories of homes for sale that are driving prices higher.
But next year, who knows? Meanwhile, it’s safe to say the calamitous plunges in home values so boldly forecast by economists last December are nowhere in sight — not yet, anyway.
Ken Harney’s email address is firstname.lastname@example.org.