After days of painstaking photography in a Kenyan wildlife preserve, Will Burrard-Lucas checked his camera and found his dream shot — a stunning shimmer from the eyes of a black leopard, a rare find in that part of the world.
“Black leopard spotted in Africa for first time in 100 years,” National Geographic announced.
“Ultra-rare black leopard is photographed for the first time in 100 YEARS in Africa,” the Daily Mail trumpeted.
“African black leopard photographed for the first time in over 100 years, scientist says,” CNN said.
There was only one problem: They weren’t true.
Burrard-Lucas, in an interview with The Washington Post, stressed that his photos, along with footage in the same area captured by San Diego Zoo researchers, did announce a breathtaking moment — just not quite the one that was then rocketing around social media, fueled by exaggerated media reports.
The recent images — taken at the Laikipia Wilderness Camp — were actually the first time in nearly a century that photographic evidence documented the rosette-patterned-speckled coat of an African leopard, confirming existence on the continent of the genetic mutation that makes black leopards, well, black.
Those headlines turned a significant yet carefully parsed achievement into a social media moment of mass confusion, helping, Burrard-Lucas said, to spread the false notion that black leopards haven’t been seen or photographed in Africa in a century.
Phoebe Okall, a photographer with the Daily Nation, photographed the animal in 2013 at the nearby Ol Jogi Conservancy, the paper reported. After the controversy erupted, the Ol Ari Nyiro Conservancy produced a high-quality image of a black leopard taken in 2007, National Geographic reported.
The difference, Burrard-Lucas noted, was the evidence needed to make a scientific judgment call. Researchers need to see the melanism, the genetic mutation, but the coats appear black to the naked eye (and the camera lens) during the day.
“But infrared imagery reveals the leopard’s iconic rosette patterns at night,” the San Diego Zoo said in a news release.
Other people clearly saw black leopards in the area. Sighting and rumors of the big cat at the park brought Burrard-Lucas to the Laikipia Wilderness Camp in the first place, he wrote.
“Everyone had a story,” said Nicholas Pilfold, a scientist who was part of the San Diego Zoo team. “It really became this myth that built up over time. It’s been something rare and elusive and very hard to get.”
Now the scientists have the images, they can begin studying why this genetic mutation occurs in the savanna, as most black leopards are found in tropical southeast Asia, where their dark coats help them sneakily hunt prey.
Capturing those pictures was quite the feat, Burrard-Lucas said, and he was frustrated that many outlets missed the point and distorted the story.
“All they’re seeing is a headline and a tweet,” he said. “They have a valid point, but my blog post is clear. People who now understand how it got used are understanding.”
Twitter users were quick to poke fun at the provocative and inaccurate headline, some posting “ultra-rare” photos of their own.
Yet other observers, like the carnivore ecologist Mordecai Ogada, argued this is another example of “conservation apartheid,” writing that, seemingly, “nothing exists in Africa until a white person observes it.” Ogada, who has done conservation work in Kenya for over a decade, added that he and a team of scientists trapped a black leopard during their research in 2001.
Kenyan outlet Citizen TV also published a roundup of reactions to the breathless news stories.
To straighten things out, Burrard-Lucas added an addendum to the blog post that started it all: “For clarification, I am not claiming that these are the first photos of a black leopard taken in Africa. I do however believe that they are the first high-quality camera trap photographs.”
At least one of the offending news outlets made a change, too, softening the iffy historical claims: “Rare black leopard captured in new images from Kenya,” CNN revised.