Members of the team traveled to 355 cities in 40 countries with suspicious baggage that carried more than 17,000 wallets.
Staff members of institutions such as museums, banks and police stations unknowingly became part of a global field experiment of civic honesty when they were presented with wallets that supposedly had been lost.
Regardless of country, people were more likely to try to return wallets with larger amounts of money inside, according to a new study published Thursday in Science. This butts against long-standing economic models that predict people are more likely to be dishonest when the potential payout is larger.
The study shows people overwhelmingly see themselves as good people and seek to maintain that image, even if it overrides the impulse to get ahead, said psychologist Nina Mazar of Boston University, who has studied honesty in lab conditions.
The new study goes a step beyond her work by testing honesty in everyday life.
For each experiment, a young European tourist walked into a bank or another institution with a wallet containing a shopping list, a key and a few duplicate business cards written in the local language. The tourist hands the wallet to a bank teller and, before quickly exiting, says: “I found this on the street near the entrance. Someone must have lost it. Can you take care of it?”
In some cases the teller would discover the wallet contained no money. In other cases there was $15 in local currency. In some wealthier countries, some wallets had either no money, $15 or almost $100. The tourists in these experiments, of course, were research assistants.
The inclination to maintain a “good guy” image — and avoid a dishonest deed — can be strong even when faced with scenarios that lead to personal gain. A decade ago, researchers first described the phenomenon as “self-concept maintenance.” People are trying to align their public image with their core beliefs about themselves, said Dan Ariely, a psychologist at Duke University and an expert on dishonesty. This led to a pivot in the thinking around dishonesty. “Its is easy to rationalize small cheating but it’s harder to rationalize large cheating,” Ariely said.
The global study shows that culture weighs in on this calculation, too. In some countries, including Kazakhstan and Peru, no more than 20 percent of people returned the wallets. In Scandinavian countries, more than 60 percent did so. “What people think is acceptable in a certain society still matters,” said Ariely.
The fact that people in almost every country were more likely to return wallets that included money (especially a lot of money) surprised the researchers. “We were puzzled at first … that can’t be true!” said Cohn, an economist at the University of Michigan and lead co-author on the study.
This global phenomena also surprised the 279 top academic economists they surveyed, who predicted people would be more likely to keep the wallets with money.
“When a behavior is surprising, that’s when you want to be cautious about over interpreting what this means for society,” said Abigail Marsh, psychologist at Georgetown University, who was not involved in the study. “But what I like about this study is that is supports so much of the data out there . . . that most people are trying to do the right thing most of the time.”