Society is loath to convict cops who kill, so civil court is often the best place for victims’ families to get results. But there, some get millions, and some get nothing.
Two bad shootings, two guilty cops. One family sues and gets a million dollars; the other sues and collects not a penny.
Joseph Erin Hamley, 21, was wandering lost and alone on an isolated stretch of Highway 412 near the Ozark National Forest, fumbling with the toy balls he kept in his pockets. Born with cerebral palsy, Hamley had shaved his head in solidarity with his brother, who was about to go to Iraq with the Arkansas National Guard.
Above: Janie Lee West, 70, (right) and her sister, Chester Mae Tucker, 72, stand on the rural property that was offered to them as compensation for the death of their brother, Harold Phillips, who was shot five times by an officer who had been on the job for less than two months. (William Widmer for The Washington Post)
The haircut gave Hamley an unfortunate resemblance to a young man who had just escaped from a prison boot camp. A passing motorist alerted the Arkansas State Police. Trooper Larry Norman raced to the scene at speeds over 100 mph, jumped out of his cruiser, aimed his shotgun at Hamley and ordered him to the ground.
About this story: As part of a year-long investigation of fatal shootings by police, The Washington Post identified and examined the cases of 59 officers who were charged over the past decade for fatally shooting someone while on duty. In criminal court, 11 of the officers were convicted and served time. But when 46 families of those shot and killed by police sought justice in the civil system, 32 received monetary awards, The Post found. Above: Janie Lee West, 70, (right) and her sister, Chester Mae Tucker, 72, stand on the rural property that was offered to them as compensation for the death of their brother, Harold Phillips, who was shot five times by an officer who had been on the job for less than two months. (William Widmer for The Washington Post)
Confused, Hamley lay on his back. The trooper ordered him to roll over, and Hamley raised his arm to turn. Norman saw the motion as evidence that Hamley was armed, and he opened fire, killing Hamley. Norman had been on the scene for less than a minute, records show.
Hamley’s mother sued the state, which settled the civil lawsuit for $1 million.
A year later, the trooper pleaded guilty to negligent homicide, a misdemeanor in Arkansas. Norman, who apologized to the family at his sentencing, served 54 days in jail.
“Nothing in this world will bring my son back,” Mary Hamley said last month, nine years after her son’s death. “It was never about the money. It was the injustice of it all.”
A thousand miles away and four years after the Hamley shooting, Elvira Fernandez called Phoenix police. Her son Danny Rodriguez was high on meth and threatening her. She wanted the police to calm him down.
Officer Richard Chrisman confronted Rodriguez in his mother’s trailer. The young man’s pit bull reacted aggressively, so Chrisman shot the dog. Then he held his handgun to Rodriguez’s head, pepper-sprayed him and zapped him with a stun gun, records show. When Rodriguez, 28 and unarmed, picked up his bicycle — to escape, his mother contends — Chrisman shot him twice in the chest.
Chrisman pleaded guilty to manslaughter and is serving seven years in prison.
Rodriguez’s parents sued, but a judge dismissed their case against the city, finding no evidence that the police department should have known that the officer had a propensity to use excessive force. Chrisman was ordered to pay Rodriguez’s parents $8.5 million, but he has virtually no assets.
“We got nothing,” Rodriguez’s mother said. “All I have is my hate — I hate myself for calling the police. I never hated anybody like I hate myself.”
Elvira Fernandez, 65, says she regrets calling the police on her son, Daniel Rodriguez, 29, after they had a fight. When the police arrived, Officer Richard Chrisman shot and killed Rodriguez and his dog. Chrisman was convicted and sent to prison. A civil suit against the city was dismissed; an $8.5 million judgment against Chrisman will probably never be collected. (Caitlin O'Hara for The Washington Post)
Though the spread of smartphone cameras has turned police-civilian confrontations into fodder for popular analysis, society remains reluctant to send police officers to prison for killing people. For the grieving families of the victims, civil lawsuits have proven far more likely to produce results.
But the system dispenses uneven justice. As part of a year-long investigation of fatal shootings by police, The Washington Post examined the cases of 59 officers who were charged over the past decade for fatally shooting someone while on duty, allegedly crossing the line between enforcing the law and breaking it.
[See The Post’s database of fatal police shootings in 2015.]
In criminal court, 11 of the officers were convicted and served time. But when 46 families of those shot and killed by police sought justice in the civil system, 32 received monetary awards, The Post found. Settlements ranged from $7,500 to $8.5 million. The median settlement was $1.2 million. Seven families have not filed suit.
When officers were criminally convicted, families won settlements in all but one case, The Post found. But when the officers were acquitted or had criminal charges dismissed, families were just as likely to win civil settlements.
The review also found that families collected more money if they settled before the criminal cases were resolved. When families accepted settlements before criminal charges were resolved, they received a median award of $2.2 million. When the settlement came after criminal proceedings ended, the families received $500,000.
Most of the settlements are between families and the officers’ employer. Going after the officer rarely pays off. Many lawyers don’t bother to sue the officer who pulled the trigger. As civil servants, they tend to have few assets. And if you don’t sue them, “you prevent the officer and the officer’s wife from making an emotional appeal to the jury,” said Michael Napier, a lawyer in Phoenix who for four decades has represented police officers, including Chrisman in the Rodriguez case.
Instead, suits are typically filed against the city or county or state that employed the officer, usually under a federal civil rights statute first enacted in 1871 to combat the Ku Klux Klan. But winning such lawsuits is difficult. The laws strongly favor police, requiring families to prove that officers acted “unreasonably” or that their departments acted with “deliberate indifference.”
“If you don’t have a good case, you’re doing people more harm than good,” said Michael Avery, founder and director of the National Police Accountability Project, a network of civil rights lawyers who handle police abuse cases. Every lawsuit is “a mine field. There are a hundred mines in the field, and we have to get across without tripping any one of them. If we trip one, we lose.”
Even when families collect settlements, victory can feel hollow. Tarika Wilson, a 26-year-old Ohio woman, was unarmed and holding her 14-month-old boy when she was killed during a SWAT raid on her home in 2008. The sergeant in the case was acquitted of homicide and assault charges; the city of Lima settled with the family for $2.5 million.
“It’s very hard on the families,” said Cheryl R. Washington, an attorney who represented Wilson’s family. “The settlements are based on the monetary value of that person’s life. What did that person do? What would they have done if they weren’t killed? . . . Her children lost their mother, and the amount of money in a case like this is never enough.”
When police kill someone, the odds that their family will receive compensation can seem as random as the spin of a roulette wheel. Harold Phillips’s family still wonders if the wheel will ever stop spinning.
In July 2009, Phillips, 54, had just arrived home after a 90-day stint in prison for shoplifting. He was outside the house in Colfax, La., roughhousing joyfully with his sister, when Officer Stephen Merchant happened by and saw what looked like a domestic assault.
Merchant, then 28 and on the job for less than two months, ordered Phillips to stop. Fearful of going back to jail, Phillips ran. Merchant followed, the two fought and the officer pulled out his gun. Five bullets struck the unarmed man in the back as he tried again to get away.
Eddie Phillips, 57, stands in his driveway in Colfax, La., where the altercation between his brother, Harold Phillips, and Colfax Police Officer Stephen Merchant began. Harold Phillips, 54, who was unarmed, was shot five times in the back by Merchant, who was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to five years in prison. The family's civil lawsuit against the town and the officer was dismissed after their lawyer failed to respond to court orders and file the proper papers. (William Widmer for The Washington Post)
Merchant pleaded guilty to manslaughter and was sentenced to five years at hard labor. Leaders in the little town of 1,500 agreed that the shooting was wrong. “Everyone wanted to do right by the family,” said town attorney Numa Metoyer III.
The mayor and council members attended the funeral. “You bury him and bring us the bill,” they said, according to Janie Lee West, 70, one of Phillips’s seven siblings. But when West took the $10,000 funeral bill to the sheriff’s office, she was told there was no such deal.
Instead, a local radio station appealed for donations to a bank account to help with the family’s burial costs. “But when we went to the bank,” West said, “they said nobody brought no money.”
The family would have to settle the debt on its own.
For six years, West made payments of $25 or $50 every few weeks from her retirement checks. Another sister, Chester Mae Tucker, paid $3,000. A few months ago, they finally paid off the Boyce Community Funeral Home.
“The city didn’t give them a penny,” said the funeral director, the Rev. Herbert Green.“The city doesn’t have millions, but they could at least be fair. This was their negligence.”
Metoyer said the town indeed offered to pay for Phillips’s burial but that the offer was valid only if the family agreed to forgo a lawsuit. The family wouldn’t make that promise, so the town rescinded the offer.
Even then, the town wanted to help, Metoyer said. But Colfax is not wealthy; sometimes it can’t even pay its employees on time. So instead of cash, the town offered a couple acres of land — “a little rural piece with a little timber on it,” Metoyer said.
“The town was nervous about a lawsuit because it has no assets to speak of and no insurance,” he said. “The only thing that the town had of any value was some land, and that wasn’t worth much, either.”
West and Tucker went out to look at the property. “It was a big mud hole with rocks in it, big old rocks they dug off the road,” West said. “People saw that, and they were just laughing at us.”
The family turned down the land.
Green, the funeral director, urged the family to contact a lawyer, Darrell Hickman. On behalf of Phillips’s siblings, Hickman filed a federal suit in 2010 against the town and Merchant, who by then had been fired. (Merchant served only a few months of his five-year prison sentence, according to lawyers in the case. He did not respond to calls and letters.)
Two years later, after repeated pleas for Hickman to respond to court orders and file the proper papers, the judge dismissed the case. By that time, the Phillips siblings had fired the attorney, who has since been suspended twice in Louisiana and Texas for violating ethics rules and failing to communicate with a client.
Hickman said the Phillips case was dismissed “because the town had no money and the officer had no assets.” Court orders cite only the lack of response from Hickman and the family’s failure to hire a new lawyer.
“None of us got nothing,” West said. “We got letters and letters, papers and papers, but we never got no kind of answers, no kind of nothing.”
In Colfax, some people talk about the Phillips case as the kind of racially combustible confrontation that might have caused a national stir if it had happened in a larger community. Phillips was black, and the officer is white. But attorneys on both sides say race was not at play. The town’s mayor, a majority of its council members and Metoyer are all black, as is Hickman.
“This had nothing to do with race,” Metoyer said. “It’s just a tragic situation. You feel for the family, but we offered everything we had.”
Janie Lee West, 70, and her sister, Chester Mae Tucker, 72, walk down a gravel road in front of the rural property that was offered to them as compensation for the death of their brother, Harold Phillips. They declined. 'It was a big mud hole with rocks in it,' West said. (William Widmer for The Washington Post)
A racial divide
Even when a family wins a substantial cash settlement, a different outcome in criminal court can make justice seem elusive.
Jonathan Ferrell, 24, a former college football star who was soon to be married and working two jobs, had just dropped off a friend early on the morning of Sept. 14, 2013. As he drove out of the suburban Charlotte neighborhood known as Bradfield Farms, Ferrell lost control of his Toyota Camry on a curve, skidded and crashed into a stand of trees.
The car was totaled. Ferrell couldn’t open the doors. He crawled out the broken rear windshield and went looking for help. Bleeding, he knocked on the door of Sarah McCartney, then 32. It was close to 2:30 in the morning.
McCartney opened the door, expecting to see her husband, a nurse, returning from the late shift. Instead, she saw Ferrell. She slammed the door, dialed 911 and activated the house alarm system,. The front lawn was bathed in floodlights.
Jonathan Ferrell was shot 10 times by Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Officer Randall “Wes” Kerrick.
“There’s a guy breaking in my front door,” McCartney told the 911 dispatcher, saying she was alone with her baby boy.
“Have you seen this person?” the dispatcher asked.
“Yes, he’s a black man.”
“You say he’s a black male?”
“Yes. Oh, my God,” McCartney said. “Please hurry.”
Eleven minutes later, three officers from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department arrived. Two were African American, and one was white: Randall “Wes” Kerrick, a former animal control officer on the force for 23 months.
A police cruiser dash cam shows Ferrell walking toward the cruiser at 2:47 a.m. One officer fired his Taser but missed. Ferrell started to run into the darkness, toward Kerrick, the only officer who had pulled his firearm. Ferrell’s hands were visible and empty before leaving the frame of the dash cam. The recorder picked up the voice of an officer, yelling: “Get on the ground!”
Twelve shots ring out, the final round fired 19 seconds after Ferrell first appeared on camera. Ten struck Ferrell, most hitting him in his chest. Ferrell, the designated driver for his friends that night, was not drunk, toxicology tests later showed. He died at the scene, his hands cuffed behind his back.
After then-Police Chief Rodney Monroe viewed the footage and read officers’ statements, he ordered Kerrick arrested, saying his officer “did not have a lawful right to discharge his weapon during the encounter.” A grand jury indicted Kerrick on felony manslaughter charges.
It was another case of a white officer shooting an unarmed black man. The Ferrell family sued, and the city of Charlotte quickly decided to settle. The city might wind up paying far more in civil penalties if Kerrick went to trial and was convicted.
“The city realized that once a jury heard about Jonathan and his mother and his brother, they would be impressed,” said Charles G. Monnett III, a Charlotte lawyer who filed the wrongful death suit. “Jonathan was a quality person, and he came from a quality family.”
Ferrell grew up in Tallahassee in an accomplished family with a strong focus on law enforcement. His sister is a sergeant for the Leon County (Fla.) Sheriff’s Office. His cousin ran for Leon County sheriff. His stepfather is a customs officer in Miami. Another cousin, Morris A. Young, is sheriff in Gadsden County, Fla.
Young knows the dangers young black men face when they encounter police officers. “All his life, he was on the right track,” Young said. Ferrell “was looking for help, and the next thing you know, law enforcement comes and they see a young black male at night in that neighborhood. And sometimes people react to that.”
With Kerrick’s criminal trial looming, Charlotte officials announced they would settle with the Ferrell family for $2.25 million. Part of the money went to an educational foundation in Ferrell’s name, but his mother said the money doesn’t matter.
“It could have been $20 million. That will not give me my child back,” Georgia Ferrell said. “Jonathan is not coming back, and I will do whatever I can to make sure this never happens to another family.”
Three months later, the criminal case went to trial. Kerrick testified that he fired in self-defense after Ferrell ran toward him, disobeyed orders to get on the ground and then went for his gun.
Kerrick’s attorneys portrayed Ferrell as a young man looking for trouble, said Moses E. Wilson, one of three African Americans on the jury that heard the case. Wilson, 67, a retired constable from Boston, said the panel voted five times, largely along racial lines, without reaching a verdict. The judge declared a mistrial.
In August, Attorney General Roy Cooper (D), who is running for governor, announced he would not retry the case.
And last month, Charlotte officials announced another settlement, this one with Kerrick. Placed on leave without pay since the shooting, the officer asked for back pay and help with his legal expenses. The city agreed to give Kerrick nearly $180,000.
Kerrick also agreed to resign from the police force; he declined through his attorneys to comment. His resignation gave Georgia Ferrell some solace.
“He should not work as a police officer ever again, anywhere,” she said.
Jonathan Ferrell's mother, Georgia, right, and brother, Will Ferrell, visit Jonathan's grave. Georgia Ferrell holds Jonathan's childhood Winnie-the-Pooh bear. (Mark Wallheiser for The Washington Post)
‘Above the law’
Families who win million-dollar judgments often say the money does little to salve their pain. But it is proof that actions have consequences, they say, that there’s a price to pay for excessive use of force.
That’s the message that should have been delivered by the $8.5 million judgment that Danny Rodriguez’s parents won against Phoenix Police Officer Richard Chrisman. But the police department was protected: In Arizona, local governments are immune from responsibility for an officer’s behavior unless they had evidence the officer was a rogue cop and did nothing about it.
Chrisman remains in prison; he is scheduled to get out in 2019. The family’s case against the city is under appeal. But Rodriguez’s mother, Elvira Fernandez, said she never expects to see a dime.
“It’s like trying to take a million dollars out of me,” she said. “With the officer, there’s nothing there. And with the city, there’s just the feeling that they’re above the law.”
Thousands dead, few prosecuted: An analysis of fatal shootings by on-duty police officers
On duty, under fire: A Wisconsin trooper faced down a gunman who planned to go out fighting
Body cameras: Police often withhold video footage despite vows of transparency
Black and unarmed: A year after Michael Brown%u2019s fatal shooting, unarmed black men are seven times more likely than whites to die by police gunfire
Distraught people, deadly results: Officers often lack the training to approach the mentally unstable, experts say
The family could collect if they could prove that Phoenix trained Chrisman improperly or knew he had a tendency to abuse his authority. A surveillance camera once captured Chrisman planting drug paraphernalia on a mentally ill woman, and he was suspended without pay for 10 hours. But a judge concluded the planted-evidence case was too dissimilar from the shooting to serve as a warning to Chrisman’s superiors.
Last month, Rodriguez’s mother moved back into the trailer where her son was killed. For five years, it remained locked, Danny’s blood still streaked across the floor and walls. After staying with relatives and living in her car, Fernandez, 65, decided she had to face the scene.
“I can’t leave it like a haunted house,” she said. For weeks, she unlocked the door each day and spent as much time as she could tolerate scrubbing away the blood.
“Who’s responsible?” she asked. “That officer is in prison, but what does that do? The city should pay for the damages caused by somebody who worked for them. But the city doesn’t have to pay.
“Who’s responsible? Me, for calling the police. I just wanted to scare him, that’s all. My guilt and my conscience every day damages my soul. Nobody wants to be around me because I cry all the time. I miss my boy so much. I miss happiness, every day for five years. Every day.”
Elvira Fernandez said she never expects to see a dime from a civil lawsuit against Phoenix, where her son, Danny Rodriguez, was killed by a police officer. In Arizona, local governments are immune from responsibility for an officer’s behavior unless they had evidence the officer was a rogue cop and did nothing about it.
About this story:
As part of a year-long investigation of fatal shootings by police, The Washington Post identified and examined the cases of 59 officers who were charged over the past decade for fatally shooting someone while on duty. In criminal court, 11 of the officers were convicted and served time. But when 46 families of those shot and killed by police sought justice in the civil system, 32 received monetary awards, The Post found.
Alice Crites, Steven Rich, Kimberly Kindy and Kimbriell Kelly contributed to this report. Derek Hawkins is attached to The Washington Post’s investigative unit through a program with American University.
Thousands dead, few prosecuted
Among the thousands of fatal shootings at the hands of police since 2005, only 54 officers have been charged, a Post analysis found. Most were cleared or acquitted in the cases that have been resolved.