NEW DELHI — India said Thursday it would join the U.S.-led diplomatic boycott of Beijing’s Winter Olympics after China included a soldier who was involved in a deadly border skirmish with Indian troops in the torch relay ahead of the Opening Ceremonies.
The United States, Canada, Australia and Britain are among the countries that have announced diplomatic boycotts to protest Chinese human rights abuses in Xinjiang.
India’s withdrawal — and China’s decision to spotlight Qi Fabao — threatens to prolong a two-year dispute between the two Asian giants that began with a series of confrontations along the high-altitude border and has led to an entrenched military buildup. Military commanders from the two sides have held 14 rounds of talks to defuse border disagreements, with limited progress.
“It is indeed regrettable that the Chinese side has chosen to politicize an event like the Olympics,” Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Arindam Bagchi told reporters on Thursday as he announced the withdrawal of India’s top diplomat. The decision does not affect the participation of Arif Khan, the skier who will be the only athlete representing India in Beijing.
Chinese officials did not immediately respond to India’s announcement. After the Biden administration announced a diplomatic boycott in December, followed by other friendly governments, a Chinese government spokesman responded by accusing the Western countries of politicizing the sporting event and vowing they would “pay a price.”
India’s move came a day after Qi, a regimental commander in the People’s Liberation Army, became one of 1,200 torchbearers to carry the Olympic flame during its three-day relay through the Olympic Park and around several sporting venues in Beijing. Qi was shown on Chinese television on Wednesday snapping into a military salute with the Chinese speed skating star Wang Meng, who handed him the torch for a short jog.
In China, Qi was awarded top military honors and hailed as a hero in state media after he suffered serious head injuries during a June 2020 brawl with Indian troops in the Galwan Valley, a border region contested by the two neighbors. According to Chinese state media, Qi was seeking to negotiate with Indian counterparts that day when he was attacked with “steel pipes, clubs and stones.” Indian officials later said 20 of its soldiers died during the ensuing brawl. China acknowledged four deaths, but widespread speculation on Chinese social media has suggested the true number of casualties may be higher.
Since recovering from a coma, Qi has been featured by China Central Television, the state broadcaster. He was photographed in his fatigues in December and gave interviews declaring he was “ready to return to the battlefield.”
After state outlets publicized Qi’s leg of the torch relay on Wednesday, it drew a torrent of criticism from within India and from James E. Risch (R-Idaho), the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Hu Xijin, the former editor of the Global Times and an influential Chinese state media official, defended Qi’s role on Twitter.
“Qi Fabao is a survivor of that bloody clash. He participated in the torch relay,” Hu wrote. “What I saw from it was a call for China-India border peace and call for world peace. What’s wrong with this?”