Demonstrations and some strikes took place in cities including Chicago, London and Washington, as drivers made demands including greater job security, a livable income, more transparency in the ride-hailing companies’ fare systems and a limit on the companies’ commissions to guarantee that drivers receive 80 to 85 percent of a fare.
Uber and Lyft drivers in New York City shut off their apps between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. and led a procession across the Brooklyn Bridge, organizers said.
In San Francisco, several dozen protesters gathered outside Uber’s headquarters starting at noon, a cheerful demonstration that at one point spilled into a busy street and blocked traffic as drivers passing by honked in support. The demonstrators, accompanied by a brass band, erupted in chants and held signs decrying their diminishing wages. They chanted, “Fair fares! Fair fares! ... We won’t drive another day!”
The actions were timed to draw attention before Uber’s initial public offering on Friday, expected to raise about $9 billion. Academics who study tech workforce trends, however, pointed to what appears to be a growing trend as so-called gig economy workers who expected to benefit from an explosion in jobs created by tech giants instead feel used due to the changing nature of their roles and the increasingly complicated ways their pay is calculated — especially as executives at those companies make millions.
“In some ways it’s like a first global digital picket line that’s being planted,” said Katie Wells, a postdoctoral research fellow at Georgetown University studying the lives of Uber drivers in the D.C. region. “There’s an opportunity with the connectivity of all this technology. ... [But] promises of data transparency have really been cut out for a whole swath of people.”
Instacart had to reverse course earlier this year on a change to the way it paid its workers after a revolt when it stopped handing over customers’ entire tips, another example of what workers said was a lack of transparency. DoorDash and Amazon have also faced similar criticism on gig economy workers’ wages.
Uber and Lyft have introduced “upfront” pricing in recent years, showing passengers the estimated cost of a trip to avoid the surprise fares that could accompany pricing that surges with demand. But unlike a traditional taxi meter system, which pays drivers a set portion of the passenger fare, drivers are instead paid according to time and mileage regardless of the ride’s price, leading to consternation about the gulf between the companies’ cut and theirs. Previously, the companies gave drivers a percentage of the total fare.
“It’s really hard to figure out how much you’re actually making at the end of the day, especially after all your expenses,” said Moira Muntz, a spokeswoman for the Independent Drivers Guild, which represents 70,000 ride-hail drivers in New York City. “That’s a major piece of the transparency issue.”
Uber argued in its stock filing this month that its decision to decouple passenger fares from driver pay was one of the reasons to invest in the company. It helps avoid guaranteeing fares to drivers, something that can pad profits. However, the company also may eat losses if it needs to compensate drivers more than a rider is willing to pay.
The new system has frustrated many drivers, who say their paychecks have decreased as it has become harder to capitalize on driving hours when passengers are willing to pay more.
“It used to be the passenger pays ‘this much’ and you get ‘this’ percentage of it,” said Steve Gregg, 51, an Uber driver and an organizer with Gig Workers Rising, a labor group that helped arrange the protest in front of Uber headquarters in San Francisco. “They eliminated that. What they really did is create opportunity for a much higher degree of manipulation.”
Gregg said that his pay has dropped to about $900 a week for 60 hours of work after expenses, from $1,200 for 40 hours two years ago. He attributes that in part to the change in fare structure, as well as lower distance-based rates.
Uber said Wednesday the strikes did not have a significant impact on wait times, fares or the number of drivers logged into the app in any of the cities where the demonstrations took place. The company added that it provides “full transparency” on rider fares and driver earnings on each trip, giving drivers the option to see their distance and mileage-based calculations within the app, including trip-by-trip and total earnings. The system is akin to an itemized receipt, however, not a live taxi meter.
Lyft said that drivers’ hourly earnings have increased over the past two years, and that drivers take home more than $20 per hour on average — although the company did not provide a median wage as an example of how that figure translated across its contract workforce. A strike ahead of that company’s IPO in March had a negligible effect on wait times and fares.
The strikes could still have an impact on passenger fares and wait times in some cities. The strikes were expected to span from two to 12 hours, depending on the city. Elsewhere, organizers advised passengers to boycott the apps between certain hours in solidarity.
Many drivers have put in long hours already this week to help make up the hours, organizers said.
Meanwhile, pro-labor political leaders expressed support for the demonstrations Wednesday. Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.), who is seeking the Democratic presidential nomination, sent an early morning tweet highlighting the pay disparity between Uber’s top five executives, including chief executive Dara Khosrowshahi’s $45 million in yearly compensation, and its drivers.
“I stand with striking Uber and Lyft drivers today,” he said. “The greed has got to end.”
Jeremy Corbyn, the leader of Britain’s Labour Party, asked passengers to avoid using Uber.
“Stand with these workers on strike today, across the UK and the world, asking you not to use Uber between 7am and 4pm,” he wrote on Twitter, adding the hashtag #UberShutDown.