Though Google said just two-tenths of a percent of recordings are used for human review, it also disclosed that customers may occasionally be recorded even when they aren’t using Assistant.
Human review of the recordings is necessary to improve the software’s understanding of various languages, Google said in a blog post.
“Language experts review and transcribe a small set of queries to help us better understand those languages,” wrote Google product manager David Monsees. “This is a critical part of the process of building speech technology.”
How and why voice-reliant devices record customer queries has been a hot-button issue this year. Amazon, for instance, records and retains conversations on its Alexa devices, and it employs humans to review some of them as well. The company is facing several lawsuits from customers who say they didn’t consent to having their voices or those of minors recorded.
(Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post.)
Google said that the recordings obtained by Belgian site VRT NWS were a breach of privacy and that it is investigating.
“We are conducting a full review of our safeguards in this space to prevent misconduct like this from happening again,” Monsees said.
The latest disclosure from Google highlights how human reviewers are often at the heart of what many tech firms say are automated processes. Thousands of humans, alongside software, review content on Facebook, YouTube and other social media sites to ensure they are appropriate, for instance.