The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Biden’s NASA nominee says he’ll try to stick to Trump’s schedule for return to the moon

Many experts believe the 2024 timetable is unrealistic, and Congress has not appropriated enough money to make it happen.

Former senator Bill Nelson, nominee to be administrator of NASA, speaks with Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee Chairman Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation confirmation hearing began on Wednesday on Capitol Hill in Washington. (Graeme Jennings/Pool via AP)
Placeholder while article actions load

Former senator Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), President Biden’s pick to be NASA Administrator, said during his confirmation hearing Wednesday that he would push to land the astronauts on the moon as soon as possible, carrying on the key space policy program of the Trump administration.

Nelson said the ambitious moon program, dubbed Artemis, transcends politics and that it “has to be continued, regardless of who’s in the majority, of who’s in the presidency.”

Nelson was one of three Biden administration nominees who appeared simultaneously before members of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee in a hearing notable for an often head-snapping switch among topics. The other nominees were Lina Khan, who has been named to be a member of the Federal Trade Commission, and Leslie Kiernan, who Biden has tapped as general counsel of the Department of Commerce.

A longtime advocate of space exploration who flew on the space shuttle in 1986, Nelson, 78, is expected to win confirmation handily and was praised by senators on both side of the aisle. During her opening remarks, Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), the chairwoman of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, said Nelson’s “reputation as a tireless advocate for the space program is well deserved. And at this moment NASA needs a great advocate that we all can be confident in.”

But she also said she was concerned about the $2.9 billion contract NASA awarded last week to SpaceX to build a spacecraft to land astronauts on the moon. In winning the contract, SpaceX beat out Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin, which is based in Seattle in Cantwell’s home state, and Dynetics, an Alabama-based defense contractor. (Bezos owns The Washington Post.)

She said she was concerned that the contract went to a single company instead of two, which NASA had said it wanted to promote competition and ensure there is a backup in case one of the companies runs into trouble.

She pressed Nelson to “commit to rapidly providing Congress with a plan for assuring that kind of resiliency out of the human lander program.”

"I have to say I was surprised last week about the human landing system development contract,” she said.

Nelson said that he would, adding that “competition is always good.”

NASA officials said they did not have enough money from Congress to fund two contracts and decided to proceed with the SpaceX award for the first lunar landing. The agency would, however, “begin work immediately on a follow-up competition” to “provide regularly recurring services to the lunar surface that will enable these crewed missions on sustainable basis,” NASA’s Lisa Watson-Morgan, NASA’s lunar lander program manager, said last week.

Nelson said he supported that, but Cantwell indicated she was not satisfied, saying: "I think there needs to be redundancy. And it has to be clear this process can’t be redundancy later, it has to be redundancy now.”

She vowed to follow up with Nelson.

Blue Origin had pushed hard for the contract and had put together what it called a “national team” that includes Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Draper for its proposal. Blue Origin was the biggest recipient of money under the initial phase of the contract, awarded last year, winning $579 million. It has not said whether it would attempt to challenge the contract awarded to SpaceX last week.

NASA has said it awarded a single contract in part to move quickly. And Nelson said he believed it was still possible for astronauts to land on the lunar surface by 2024 — meeting an arbitrary deadline set by the Trump administration.

But top officials in the agency have said privately it is not feasible and publicly that it is highly unlikely. The Space Launch System rocket that would be used to launch the astronauts has been repeatedly delayed, and Congress has appropriated only a fraction of the funds NASA says it needs to meet the deadline. And recently the NASA Inspector General said in a report that NASA “faces significant challenges” that would make its plan to “land astronauts on the Moon by the end of 2024 highly unlikely.”

Khan, Biden’s FTC nominee, signaled in her testimony that she would bring an aggressive approach to regulating tech giants. That would mark a major reversal from the Obama era, when the agency took a largely hands-off approach to big mergers and acquisitions in the tech sector.

Lina Khan’s nomination hearing signals a new era of tough antitrust enforcement for the tech industry

Khan told senators that in the past few years, evidence has come to light that the Obama administration “missed opportunities” for enforcement actions against big tech, and she said the FTC has to be “much more vigilant” about vetting acquisitions by major companies such as Facebook and Google.

Khan faced some tough questions from Republicans who wondered about her level of experience and whether her previous work for a House committee probing tech companies’ possible antitrust violations would require her to recuse herself from key decisions. But Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) seemed to offer an endorsement in comments urging the FTC to do more to regulate big tech. “I look forward to working with you," he said.