But even with winters trending milder, they have still unleashed brutal cold snaps and blockbuster storms, and there’s no reason this year won’t be different.
The temperature forecast
Most of the nation is favored to be warmer than normal, but “cold weather is anticipated and some areas could still experience a colder-than-average winter,” the outlook said.
Areas least likely to be cold, relative to average, are Alaska and Hawaii, where the outlook highlights high chances for above-average temperatures. Abnormally warm oceans surround both of these states, which have experienced record-breaking temperatures at times since the summer.
The Upper Midwest, which endured a brutally cold second half of winter last year, is the only part of the Lower 48 where above-normal temperatures are not favored. Instead, the outlook calls for equal chances of below-, normal and above-normal temperatures.
The precipitation forecast
NOAA’s outlook paints a sprawling zone with elevated chances for above-normal precipitation from Montana to the northern Mid-Atlantic. Within this zone, it’s especially likely to be wet in the northern plains and Upper Midwest. These areas also had a very wet second half of winter last year, which led to historic spring and summer flooding, and the situation could repeat next year if this forecast is correct.
Drier-than-normal weather is favored in parts of the Deep South and central California, where NOAA is calling for the onset of drought conditions.
Ocean temperatures are abnormally high off the California coast, forming a zone some scientists have referred to as “the blob.” Although some scientists have attempted to link this warm water with elevated chances for drought in California, Mike Halpert, deputy director of NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center, told reporters Thursday that he’s unconvinced.
The blob “usually doesn’t play a large role in climate outcomes over North America,” he said.
Halpert made clear that NOAA’s forecast for drought in California is based on computer model forecasts, not the high offshore temperatures.
Halpert stressed that predicting how the winter will play out is especially complicated this year. That’s because there’s no strong climate signal such as El Niño or La Niña. When these signals are present, they tend to favor particular patterns of temperature and precipitation in North America.
“Without either El Niño or La Niña conditions, short-term climate patterns like the Arctic Oscillation will drive winter weather and could result in large swings in temperature and precipitation,” Halpert said.
Halpert said these short-term climate patterns typically take control of conditions for periods of about two to four weeks and are difficult to predict far in advance. Figuring out their net effect on the flavor of the winter is thus “kind of tricky,” he said.
In the absence of longer-term signals, Halpert said NOAA is relying more heavily on computer model forecasts this year. He said above-normal precipitation in the north-central United States was one of its more consistent predictions.
Seasonal outlooks do not have the same degree of accuracy and reliability as day-to-day weather forecasts. Halpert said NOAA’s winter temperature outlooks typically provide a 30 to 35 percent improvement over a random guess, while precipitation outlooks offer only about half that much improvement.
Last year, NOAA’s winter temperature outlook was worse than a random guess, largely because temperatures plunged in February in the Plains and Mountain West after mild weather had been expected.