Meiliana, who like many Indonesians uses only one name, may appeal the decision against her, even though convictions of this type are rarely overturned.
“She did not commit blasphemy. What she did was offer a neighborly complaint, and that is not an insult to Islam,” said Ismail Hasani, a legal expert at the Islamic State University in Jakarta and research director at the Setara Institute for Democracy and Peace, which he said would work with other civil society groups to fight Meiliana’s conviction. “More generally, we believe that the blasphemy law itself does more than anything else to limit freedom of religion in Indonesia.”
Indonesia, a multiethnic democracy made up of thousands of islands, officially recognizes six religions as fully equal under the law and has long been viewed as one of the most tolerant Muslim-majority nations in the world. But developments in the past few years, including Ahok’s conviction, proposed legislation to ban homosexual acts and the rise of Islamist political groups, have worried supporters of the secular approach.
This month, Indonesia’s relatively moderate president, Joko Widodo, stunned his more-liberal supporters by announcing that his running mate in his reelection bid next year would be Islamic cleric Ma’ruf Amin. In his role as head of the Indonesian Ulema Council, Amin was influential in the push to jail Ahok, a former close ally of Widodo.
Her case has also sparked discussions about the call to prayer itself and its volume.
“I love the sound of the azan,” Indonesian stand-up comic Sakdiyah Ma’ruf posted to her Twitter account, referring to the call to prayer. “But really, as a Muslim that just had a baby, the loud dawn calls to prayer coming from several mosques at once can sometimes be disturbing.”
Like Ahok, Meiliana is part of Indonesia’s ethnic-Chinese minority, which has often been subject to discrimination. Human Rights Watch has found that the blasphemy law has been used to persecute a wide variety of groups, and it estimates that at least 22 people have been convicted under the law since Widodo assumed office in 2014. Along with groups such as Amnesty International and the Setara Institute, Human Rights Watch has been actively campaigning to revoke the blasphemy law.
“These blasphemy cases infringe upon people’s rights,” Hasani said. He added, referring to the president by his nickname, “And the fact that they have continued indicates that Jokowi probably doesn’t care too much about that problem.”