Rahaf Mohammed Alqunun walks by Maj. Gen. Surachate Hakparn, chief of the Thai immigration police, before leaving the Suvarnabhumi Airport in Bangkok on Monday. (Immigration police/AP)

When Rahaf Mohammed Alqunun, an 18-year-old Saudi woman, landed in Thailand on Saturday, she became a prisoner. Rather than allowing her to fly to Australia and seek asylum, Thai officials detained her in a hotel and prepared to send her back to the Middle East.

But then, just two days later, they suddenly changed their plans: Alqunun was allowed to stay in Thailand and apply for refugee status, which she says she needs as protection from her abusive family. In record time she appeared to have been approved and the U.N. refugee agency referred her case for resettlement to Australia, which said Wednesday it was considering it.

The decision stunned many observers, given that Thailand’s military government has often been hostile to asylum seekers. In 2018, according to Human Rights Watch, Thailand detained thousands of people, including many Pakistani asylum seekers, during an immigration crackdown called Operation X-Ray Outlaw Foreigner. In November, the country detained a Bahraini former soccer player named Hakeem al-Araibi, who was living as a refugee in Australia after speaking out against a Bahraini official.

So why did the country back down in Alqunun’s case?

An obvious reason may be the global attention Alqunun attracted on Twitter. The Saudi teen posted videos from inside the hotel room where she was being held, documenting her refusal to emerge until she was put in contact with UNHCR, the refugee agency.

Abdalelah Mohammed A. al-Shuaibi, the chargé d’affaires at the Saudi Embassy in Thailand, said during a Tuesday meeting with Thai officials that “we wish they had confiscated her phone instead of her passport,” according to CNN.

Another factor may be growing international disapproval of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s brutal war in Yemen and the killing of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, apparently at the hands of the Saudi government.

“You could argue that in this post-Khashoggi era, no nation would want to bend over backward to help the Saudis,” said Michael Kugelman, deputy director of the Asia program at the Wilson Center. “Even authoritarian states do give mind to reputational considerations."

But history could be playing a role as well — namely the mysterious events surrounding a 1989 jewel heist that caused a diplomatic freeze between the two countries.

It all began when a Thai gardener working for a Saudi prince stole as much as 200 pounds of jewelry from the family (he is rumored to have wheeled the booty out of the estate in a vacuum cleaner) and then fled home to Thailand. When Thai authorities returned the jewels to Saudi Arabia, the family found that many of them were cheap fakes. They sent Saudi officials to Thailand to investigate, but three of the diplomats were mysteriously murdered.

Kugelman said relations between the two countries have vastly improved since the heist, but some scars apparently remain. In 2010, according to the Economist, Thai Muslims were still being held in limbo waiting for visas for their pilgrimages to Mecca.

Read more:

Saudi woman alleging abuse will remain in Thailand as refugee claim is processed

No indication Saudi sisters found dead and bound with duct tape in NYC were killed, authorities say

Indonesia says it had no warning Saudi Arabia would be executing maid