The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Taliban facing backlash after U.S. drone strike against al-Qaeda leader

Popular anger could push regime to retaliate and further turn away from the West in favor of hard-line religion

Taliban fighters patrol in the neighborhood where a U.S. drone strike killed al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul on Aug. 2. (EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock)
Placeholder while article actions load
correction

An earlier version of this article included two quotes attributed to the Twitter account of Taliban leader Anas Haqqani. On further review, it was determined that the account, which bore his name, did not belong to him. The quotes have been removed from the article.

KABUL — The U.S. drone strike that killed al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri here early Sunday also struck a humiliating blow against the Taliban regime, which had secretly hosted the aging extremist in the heart of the Afghan capital for months but failed to keep him safe.

Just as the Taliban was preparing to celebrate its first year in power later this month, the attack has sparked a nationalistic backlash against the beleaguered regime at home and taunting comments on social media calling for revenge against the United States.

“If the martyrdom of Zawahiri is confirmed, then shame on you that we could not protect the true hero of Islam,” an Afghan named Ehsanullah tweeted in response to a statement early Tuesday by the chief Taliban spokesman that the al-Qaeda leader was killed in a U.S. drone strike.

The Post's Joby Warrick explains Ayman al-Zawahiri's role in al-Qaeda and the significance of his killing for the terrorist group and the world. (Video: Alexa Juliana Ard/The Washington Post)

The assassination of Zawahiri, a hero to Islamist militant groups but a long-wanted terrorist in the West, has also crystallized the ongoing struggle between moderate and hard-line factions within the Taliban regime. Several leaders of the hard-line Haqqani network, long denounced by U.S. officials for directing high-profile terrorist attacks, hold powerful positions in the regime.

Now, some Afghan and American analysts said, the drone strike may harden Taliban attitudes and push the regime toward an open embrace of the extremist forces it pledged to renounce in its 2020 peace deal with the United States.

“The Taliban are in deep political trouble now, and they are going to face pressure to retaliate. The relationship they have with al-Qaeda and other jihadi groups remains very strong,” said Asfandyar Mir, an expert on Islamic extremism at the U.S. Institute of Peace in Washington. “I think we should brace for impact.”

Mir noted that while Taliban officials have been hoping to gain international recognition and access to $7 billion in assets that were frozen by the Biden administration, the group’s supreme religious leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada, declared flatly at a national conclave in May, “We are in a clash of civilizations with the West.”

U.S. kills al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in drone strike in Kabul

There is deep-seated animosity here toward the United States, which intensified after U.S. troops withdrew last year and the war economy collapsed, leaving millions of Afghans jobless. When Afghan officials belatedly confirmed that a U.S. drone had killed the al-Qaeda leader, after first insisting the strike was a harmless rocket attack, many Afghans were infuriated.

“We have so many worries already. For a whole year, there have been no jobs, no business, no activity. But at least the fighting was over. The Taliban was in charge, and there was good security,” said a resident of the Sherpur neighborhood, where the drone struck, who gave his name as Hakimullah. “Now, suddenly, this attack happens, and everyone is frightened again.”

Many Afghans seem to know little about Zawahiri or al-Qaeda. In part, this is because so many of them were born after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks planned and carried out by al-Qaeda, and in part because the al-Qaeda fighters who joined forces with the Taliban are Middle Easterners whose presence in Afghanistan has always been low profile.

What Ayman al-Zawahiri’s killing means for al-Qaeda

Until now, people here were far more focused on the threat posed by a different Sunni Muslim extremist movement, known as the Islamic State-Khorasan or ISIS-K. The group has in the past repeatedly bombed mosques, schools and other sites in Kabul, especially during the Shiite Muslim festival of Muharram, which began this week.

Taliban Interior Minister Siraj Haqqani denied that al-Qaeda maintains a presence in Afghanistan and claimed that the government would not allow such groups to operate in the country. Speaking in an interview Tuesday night with an Indian television station, he vowed that the Taliban would continue to battle the Islamic State.

Among those most dismayed by the turn of events are Afghan civilians who have tried to form working relationships with the new Taliban authorities, encouraging them to develop moderate and practical governing policies rather than focusing exclusively on religion.

Faiz Zaland, who teaches governance and political science at Kabul University, expressed frustration with the Taliban for failing to anticipate the risks of bringing Zawahiri to the capital and concern that the U.S. attack had doomed chances for the moderate elements in the regime to compete with the hard-line religious figures at the top.

“The Taliban are stuck now, and it’s their own fault,” he said. “This is going to undercut the achievements of their first year, and people who care feel betrayed and scared.”

Haq Nawaz Khan in Peshawar, Pakistan, contributed to this report.

Correction: An earlier version of this article misstated the value of Afghan assets frozen by the Biden administration. The accurate figure is $7 billion. The article has been updated.

Loading...