A recent Chinese report hailed progress in the South China Sea last year, noting construction totaling 290,000 square meters, or 72 acres. That included work on hangars, missile shelters and large radar and sensor arrays, according to satellite images reviewed by the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, a U.S. think tank.
China claims nearly all of the South China Sea. In 2016, an international tribunal ruled against those claims, but the finding has largely been ignored — both by the Philippines, which brought the case, and by Beijing.
Having added thousands of acres to the Spratly Islands in recent years, China is now building out bases there. Once operational, these outposts will enable the Chinese military to better patrol the South China Sea, potentially changing the regional balance of power.
It is both a territorial dispute and a test of regional influence, with an increasingly assertive China often appearing to set the terms.
Though Chinese reclamation and building predate Trump, many expected the Republican president to push back more forcefully than the previous administration.
The National Security Strategy released last month does say China's "efforts to build and militarize outposts in the South China Sea endanger the free flow of trade, threaten the sovereignty of other nations, and undermine regional stability."
But experts see few signs the issue is a White House priority.
"Nobody in the White House is super focused on South China Sea stuff, at least as far as we know," said Julian Ku, a law professor at Hofstra University School of Law and an expert on the South China Sea. "I think it's going to remain on the back burner, and that's definitely going to help the Chinese."
The administration's quiet approach gave China a "free pass" in 2017, ceding ground at a critical time, said Jay L. Batongbacal, director of the University of the Philippines Institute for Maritime Affairs and Law of the Sea.
"If China does base ships there and move in weapons, it will complete their planning, it will make permanent their dominance of the South China Sea," he said. "Because once they do that, they won't be pulling back."
In 2018, that may create new challenges for Trump.
As a candidate, Trump cast China as an always-winning upstart that ought to be cut down to size.
China will "go in the South China Sea and build a military fortress the likes of which perhaps the world has not seen," he warned in 2016. "Because they have no respect for our president and they have no respect for our country."
But in his first year in office, Trump has been the one showing respect, heaping praise on China's authoritarian president.
A readout from his November visit with Xi said Trump raised the issue of the South China Sea, but he did not stress it publicly. In Vietnam, Trump casually offered to mediate — though there did not seem to be any takers.
The president's approach so far has been to regularize the type of Freedom of Navigation Operations, or FONOPs, that the Obama administration authorized in 2015. May saw the first FONOP of the Trump era, when a destroyer, the USS Dewey, sailed within 12 nautical miles of Mischief Reef in the disputed Spratly Islands. There have been several since.
A spokesman for the National Security Council said the FONOPs program challenges excessive maritime claims by various states to preserve free movement on the sea and in the air.
The problem, experts said, is that FONOPs have thus far failed to stop Chinese building — and are therefore unlikely to stop whatever comes next.
"FONOPs are not a full strategy," said Bonnie Glaser, a senior adviser for Asia at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
"It was not enough in the Obama era and it's not enough under Trump," Glaser said.
Though Trump has given no clear signs that he plans to make the South China Sea a priority in 2018, his hand may be forced.
The president's push to get China to rein in North Korea is not going according to plan. He has said as much on Twitter. In the months ahead, he will probably face pressure to take a tougher line with Beijing.
"We know that the Pentagon, unlike the Trump administration, is very much worried about the South China Sea," said Richard Javad Heydarian, a Manila-based security analyst. "The Pentagon is looking at options to bring the fight to the Chinese and up the ante there."
The question is what the Chinese side does next.
Most experts say they believe China will press ahead with both civilian and military building projects. Having constructed facilities for planes and ships, it may soon start rotating them through on a regular basis.
Beijing could declare what are known as "straight baselines" in the Spratlys. These are in effect perimeters connecting the outermost points of a group of islands, turning the sea within into "internal waters." In the case of the Spratlys, straight baselines would enclose features occupied by other nations.
China declared straight baselines in the Paracel island chain in 1996 and has in recent years signaled that it may do so in the Spratlys, a move that would be hotly contested and would almost certainly draw a U.S. response.
A less likely scenario would be Beijing beginning to dredge near Scarborough Shoal, a disputed, U-shape reef not far from the Philippine coast.
Since Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte took office in 2016, China has held off land reclamation there. If the Xi-Duterte truce falls apart, Beijing could decide to start, crossing what has long been seen as a U.S. red line.
Any of these moves would require the United States to rethink the status quo and take South China Sea strategy off "autopilot," said Glaser of CSIS.
"There is not enough thinking about what the U.S. will do to deter or respond to what will be the next Chinese actions in 2018," she said.
Shirley Feng in Beijing contributed to this report.