The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Britons muse on ‘Megxit’: ‘Diana would be so proud’

After announcing plans to “step back” from royal duties Jan. 8, Britons gave their takes on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s future plans. (Video: Karla Adam/The Washington Post)

LONDON — With their decision to distance themselves from their royal duties this past week, Harry and Meghan are just following in the path of many young couples: hunting for new jobs, spreading their wings outside the extended clan and trying to reinvent themselves as a family.

There's no precedent in modern times for this kind of working arrangement within the royal family, or "The Firm," as some in Britain like to call it.

But the maverick course set by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex seems just fine to many watching it unfold as a sort of royal soap opera, replete with grumpy in-laws, a baffled father and questions over who will pay the bills.

In interviews around Buckingham Palace, the overwhelming feeling from those milling outside the palace — a selective audience, granted — was one of support for Harry and Meghan. They applauded their efforts to start a new, independent life away from the world’s most famous family — as long as it didn’t dent the public purse.

Harry and Meghan are “grown-ups. They should be able to make their own choices,” said Theresa Leonard, 51, a horse-riding instructor who was taking in the sights before heading to the theater. She said that American-born Meghan hasn’t been treated fairly by the British tabloids.

“With Meghan being divorced and her being mixed race as well, that’s probably not gone down very well. But if Harry is happy and Meghan is happy, that’s all that matters,” she said.

But who’s going to pay for the butler?

“I think Diana would be so proud of her boys for standing up for what they believe, especially with their ladies and their privacy,” she added, referring to the late princess and mother of princes Harry and William.

A survey by the pollster JL Partners published in the Daily Mail found 72 percent of Britons said that the queen should let them go — a break that was quickly dubbed “Megxit.”

But the poll also found that 71 percent said that Meghan and Harry were wrong not to tell Elizabeth II in advance of their decision.

But if the public seems supportive of them going their own way, they don’t appear keen to fork out taxpayer dollars.

For example, 73 percent said they should give up taxpayer-funded security, and 60 percent said they should pay back the 2.4 million pounds, or $3.13 million, spent on renovating Frogmore Cottage, Harry and Meghan’s residence in Windsor, where they plan to stay when back in Britain as part of plans to also spend time in North America.

Harry and Meghan clearly surprised the palace with their bombshell news Wednesday of wanting to roll back their royal duties. But some close to the royal family have suggested the announcement may have been rushed out following a leak in the Sun tabloid.

Some of the Brits outside the palace wondered the same thing.

“Did they drop a bombshell? Or was it in the pipelines?” said Sandy Hanvey, 54, a handyman from Cambridgeshire.

He suggested that whatever happens next, the queen will have the final sign-off.

“I think they will do good if the queen allows them to do what they want to do. Whether she will or not, I don’t know, to be quite honest. As for moving to Canada or America, I don’t know if that’s a good idea or not, but time will tell,” he said.

The British media reported Saturday that the queen has called a family meeting for Monday at the royal residence Sandringham to thrash out options. Sky News said that Meghan, who is currently in Canada, might call in.

Prince Harry in ‘crisis’ talks with Charles

A front-page article in the Daily Telegraph read: “Queen wants rift repaired in 72 hours.”

Standing outside the palace’s wrought iron gates, Suzie Davison, 21, a university student, said that it was a family matter and that the public shouldn’t get too worked up about it.

“At the end of the day, there are more pressing things we should be caring about, like climate change and all the horrible stuff in the Middle East,” she said.

“The self-funded bit, that’s the only thing I’ve heard people talking about,” she added. “People don’t really care that they are stepping down. It’s more like, ‘Where is money going to come from? Is he going to get a job?’ ”

She said it should not have come as a shock that the couple would want to spend more time in North America.

“You can’t expect Meghan Markle to dedicate her whole life to the U.K. She’s from America. She has family there, friends there, her work was there — telling her to give that up in the first place is a strong thing . . . and she got absolutely destroyed in the tabloids over here. It’s not a surprise,” Davison said.

On their website,, Harry and Meghan said that they would no longer receive money from the taxpayer-funded Sovereign Fund, which covers 5 percent of their costs and is spent on their official office. The remaining tab, or 95 percent of their costs, is met through funds from Prince Charles via his Duchy of Cornwall estate.

Harry and Meghan stayed silent on whether they will continue to receive money from Prince Charles. They said on their website that they will strive to be “financially independent” but haven’t spelled out what that means.

Nicola Somerville, 19, a university student originally from Glasgow, Scotland, said that the tabloids have attacked Meghan “unfairly.”

“And I think it’s completely understandable for Harry to want to defend his wife after what happened to his mother, so it’s really understandable why he’s scared and wants to protect his family,” she said.

Harry has had a turbulent relationship with the press, who he believes played a role in the death of his mother, Princess Diana.

Somerville added: “If they are going to be self-supported and the U.K. actually aren’t going to be paying for anything, then let them do what they want. I completely support them.”

Harry and Meghan aim to ‘step back’ as senior royals

Harry and Meghan sue tabloid over publishing private letter

For Britain’s vicious tabloids, Meghan remains a constant target

Today’s coverage from Post correspondents around the world

Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news