WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange loses extradition fight but gets another chance to appeal

After 18 months of living under partial house arrest, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Wednesday again staved off extradition to Sweden, where he is wanted for questioning over alleged sex crimes.

At a brief hearing in central London, Britain’s Supreme Court denied Assange’s appeal against extradition but in a new twist allowed his legal team the chance to contest its ruling.

The court’s president, Nicholas Phillips, told the packed courtroom that in a 5 to 2 decision, the justices had dismissed Assange’s argument that a European arrest warrant issued for his extradition was flawed.

The judgment had been billed as the final leg in Assange’s marathon legal battle in British courts, but instead the court granted Assange’s attorney, Dinah Rose, 14 days to consider lodging an application to reopen the case after she argued that the justices’ decision was based on a point not discussed during the hearing.

It was the first time the court has said it would accept a challenge to one of its rulings since it began work in 2009.

Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service has agreed not to deport Assange before June 13, and even then, he can still appeal to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France, which would have two weeks to decide whether or not to take the case.

Assange, 40, is wanted for questioning in Sweden about separate encounters he had with two WikiLeaks volunteers during a visit he made to Stockholm in August 2010. Although he admits to brief affairs with the women, he adamantly denies their accusations of rape, sexual assault and unlawful coercion.

In February 2011, a lower court in Britain ruled that he should return to Sweden to face questioning. Assange appealed that ruling and lost, but he won permission to appeal to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case before seven judges — two more than normal — because, the court said, of the “great public importance of the issue raised.”

The case before the court had nothing to do with the sex crime allegations but rather hinged on a technicality. Assange argued the European arrest warrant that triggered his arrest in December 2010 was invalid because it was made by a prosecutor rather than a court or a judge.

Under the European extradition treaty, ushered in to help speed up transfers between European nations, a “judicial authority” must issue the warrant.

In a 161-page judgment, the Supreme Court said that a judicial authority could mean a prosecutor, as indeed it does in many European countries.

Assange’s team is now focusing on another narrow point. They contend that the majority of the seven justices on the panel based their reasoning largely on their interpretation of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties — a point that lawyers did not have a chance to discuss during the appeal.

Assange shot to international fame when his anti-secrecy Web site leaked official state secrets in the form of hundreds of thousands of Afghanistan and Iraq military reports and diplomatic cables.

His supporters say the allegations lodged against him are politically motivated and that Swedish authorities might hand him over to the United States, where he could face charges over leaking national secrets.

Over the next two weeks, Assange will remain in Britain under his current bail terms, which include wearing an electronic tag around his ankle and checking in daily with local police.

Unusually for him, Assange was not at the court hearing Wednesday. His lawyers told reporters that he was stuck in traffic.

Karla Adam is a reporter in the Washington Post’s London bureau. Before joining the Post in 2006, she worked as a freelancer in London for the New York Times and People magazine.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read World



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.