The Washington Post

Amid CIA’s battle with Senate Intelligence Committee, Brennan strikes conciliatory note

Seeking to defuse an escalating battle with the Senate Intelligence Committee, CIA Director John Brennan sent a note to the agency’s workforce Friday praising the panel and pledging to cooperate on the release of a report that is harshly critical of the CIA.

A week after the agency and the committee traded allegations of illegal conduct, Brennan said in the note that Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and other members of the panel “carry out their oversight responsibilities with great dedication and patriotism” and that the agency “has benefited over the years from their leadership.”

The conciliatory tone of the letter was in stark contrast to the stream of recriminations that erupted in public last week, when Feinstein delivered a speech on the Senate floor accusing the agency of spying on her staff in possible breach of the Constitution.

The dispute expanded this week as Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) asked the Senate’s top law enforcement official to examine the computers supplied by the agency to the committee’s staff for reviewing documents during an investigation of the CIA’s controversial interrogation program.

In previous remarks, Brennan had struck a defiant pose, signaling that the agency would be vindicated and warning that lawmakers should avoid unsubstantiated allegations.

The battle centers on a 6,000-page report the committee completed last year on the interrogation program that the CIA operated for years after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The report delivers a scathing verdict on that program, accusing the CIA of abusing prisoners and exaggerating the effectiveness of brutal methods, including a form of simulated drowning known as water-boarding.

While poring over millions of CIA documents as part of its investigation, the Senate committee discovered what lawmakers have said is an internal review apparently ordered by former CIA Director Leon E. Panetta that is consistent with some of the committee’s own findings.

The agency has maintained that the document was part of an effort to keep track of materials being turned over to the committee and not an evaluation of the interrogation program.

But the fight over how the committee obtained that document, and whether it is entitled to have it, triggered a series of hostile exchanges between Brennan and Feinstein, as well as requests to have the Justice Department determine whether either side committed a crime.

In his note, Brennan noted that “appropriate officials are reviewing the facts” of that dispute and did not acknowledge any wrongdoing by CIA.

Still, he seemed to be extending an olive branch, saying that the agency had already taken measures to address shortcomings identified in the committee’s report and pledging to work “expeditiously” if asked to declassify portions of it for public release.

Greg Miller covers intelligence agencies and terrorism for The Washington Post.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.