But Wray, testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the FBI submitted a partial report on his clearance in March and that the investigation was completed in July. Soon after, he said, the FBI received a request for a follow-up, which the bureau completed and provided in November. The FBI closed the file in January and then earlier this month, Wray said, the bureau received additional information and “we passed that on as well.”
“I am quite confident that in this instance, the FBI followed established” protocols, Wray said, speaking at the committee’s annual worldwide-threats hearing.
His remarks come as the White House has sought to deflect criticism over its handling of Porter’s clearance, saying it relies on law enforcement and intelligence agencies to run the process.
Wray’s comments stand in stark contrast to how the White House has in recent days portrayed the status of the background check and when senior officials knew about the allegations of abuse against Porter.
At the White House briefing Tuesday, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders stood by the White House’s previous explanation of the matter, saying that the presidential personnel office was still reviewing Porter’s case when the aide resigned last week.
Sanders said that while the “FBI portion was closed, the White House personnel security office, which is the one to make the recommendation for adjudication, was not finished their process; therefore, they did not make a recommendation to the White House.”
Last week, Sanders’s deputy, Raj Shah, said the background check had not been finished and that the White House saw it as the appropriate forum for the allegations of abuse and Porter’s denials to be investigated.
“We should not short-circuit an investigation just because allegations are made, unless they could compromise national security or interfere with operations at the White House. The truth must be determined,” Shah said on Thursday. “And that was what was going on with Rob Porter. His background investigation was ongoing. He was operating on an interim security clearance. His clearance was never denied, and he resigned.”
That message was reiterated by Sanders on Monday.
“As I know Raj addressed last week, we let the process play out,” she told reporters. “It was ongoing, hadn’t been completed.”
Before Wray’s testimony, the White House was facing a number of questions about how Porter’s dismissal was handled, including the role played by Chief of Staff John F. Kelly.
Kelly has said that he took action against Porter within 40 minutes of learning that the allegations against him were true. But he issued a public statement lauding Porter on Feb 6, the same night the Daily Mail made public the abuse allegations, and according to people familiar with the matter, urged Porter to stay in his job. Porter did not resign until the next morning after the publication of photos showing his first wife, Colbie Holderness, with a black eye, which she says was the result of a punch from Porter. He denies the allegations against him.
The day Porter resigned, Sanders portrayed it as his decision alone.
“I think that was a personal decision that Rob made, and one that he was not pressured to do, but one that he made on his own,” she told reporters.
Sanders also said that “the president and chief of staff have had full confidence and trust in his abilities and his performance.”
The Porter incident has also led to renewed scrutiny of how many White House officials who may have access to classified information continue to work in the West Wing without a permanent security clearance.
At Tuesday’s hearing, Daniel Coats, the director of national intelligence, declined to comment on Porter’s case or those of other White House officials, including Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser, who have temporary security clearance but still have access to classified information.
But in general, Coats said, people with temporary clearance should have limited access to classified information.
Josh Dawsey contributed to this report.