The Washington Post

Judge dismisses indictment against Indian diplomat

Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade, right, is seen with her father, Uttam Khobragade, in New Delhi, India, in January. (STR/EPA)

A federal judge dismissed an indictment Wednesday against an Indian diplomat whose arrest in December on visa fraud charges led to a major diplomatic crisis between the United States and India.

Devyani Khobragade, an Indian consular official in New York, did not have full diplomatic immunity when she was arrested in December for submitting false forms to obtain a U.S. visa for a household worker.

But the Indian government subsequently changed her job to one with full immunity, and the fact that this occurred on Jan. 8, the day before she was formally indicted, meant the indictment was invalid, Judge Shira A. Sheindlin of the Southern District of New York ruled.

The case had provoked outrage in India over both the arrest and the conditions of Khobragade’s brief detention, including a strip-search.

The State Department moved to resolve the situation by simultaneously recognizing her newly acquired immunity and declaring her persona non grata.

Read the indictment


The complaint against Devyani Khobragade, deputy consul at India's consulate in New York, describes the charges, which include visa fraud. Read it.

Explore the exhibits in the case

Before the indictment, attorneys on both sides filed dueling court petitions. Read the filings:
Offer to waive indictment deadline
Response from U.S. attorney
Response from Khobragade's attorney expressing surprise and distress

Devyani Khobragade gives an interview to Eye on South Asia in which she talks about her career and Indian diplomacy.

Although she left the country on Jan. 9, just hours after the grand jury indictment was issued, the federal prosecutor in the case warned that she would be re­arrested and tried if she ever again entered this country.

Under Wednesday’s ruling, that warning is no longer valid, although the court said she could be re-indicted if the prosecutor chose. Her attorney, Daniel N. Arshack, said that would be an “aggressive and unnecessary act.”

Khobragade, whose husband and two children are U.S. citizens, would have to apply for a visa to reenter the United States.

Neither the U.S. attorney in the case nor the State Department offered immediate comment on the ruling.

Karen DeYoung is associate editor and senior national security correspondent for the Washington Post.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
It's in the details: Five ways to enhance your kitchen makeover
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Border collies: A 'mouse trap' for geese on the National Mall
Play Videos
Bao: The signature dish of San Francisco
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
What you need to know about Planned Parenthood
Play Videos
How to save and spend money at college
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Europe's migrant crisis, explained

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.