POSTER DISPUTE
Antiwar Group Sues City Over Laws on Signs
|
|
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
An antiwar coalition filed court papers yesterday challenging D.C. laws that regulate posting signs in public places.
The court action comes one week after the D.C. Department of Public Works ordered the ANSWER Coalition to remove its signs pasted on electrical boxes around the city or face nearly $10,000 in fines. Public Works officials say the posters advertising a Sept. 15 antiwar march were improperly put up using an adhesive that makes the posters hard to remove.
The coalition asked a federal judge to stop the city from regulating signs posted on D.C. property until the city creates a "constitutionally allowable and non-discriminating system" for determining the rules on sign posting. The coalition alleges the city gives preferential treatment to signs for political candidates, commercial businesses and crime prevention, while bankrupting grass-roots campaigns with massive fines.
"Today it's the ANSWER Coalition; tomorrow it might be another grass-roots organization," said Carl Messineo of the Partnership for Civil Justice, which is representing the coalition.
The D.C. attorney general's office is aware of the complaint and is reviewing it, said spokeswoman Melissa Merz, who declined to comment further.
City law allows people and organizations to hang posters on lampposts as long as they can be easily removed and there are no more than three on one side of a block. Sign hangers must date the signs when they are posted and register two copies of the sign with the city.
Violations carry fines of $150 for each offending sign.
Coalition organizers said they use water-soluble paste to hang the signs and provide all people who hang signs with a copy of the rules. They argue that electrical boxes are equivalent to lampposts and that no individuals or groups should have to notify the government of their political opinions.
It is common for the city to fine organizations for illegally posted signs of all sorts, said Public Works spokeswoman Linda Grant, adding that the department does not base its decisions on the content of posters. Work crews began removing the posters two weeks ago, she said.
The signs promote an antiwar march set for Sept.15, the date that Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, is to provide a progress report to President Bush and Congress. Organizers hope that tens of thousands of people will join the march, which is scheduled to begin in front of the White House and end at the Capitol.
Yesterday morning the Alliance for Global Justice, a nonprofit organization that shares office space with the coalition, received two similar citations and potential fines from the city for the posters, said Mara Verheyden-Hilliard of the Partnership for Civil Justice.
The National Park Service has also asked the coalition to remove signs on federal property or pay for their removal but has not set a deadline.
At a news conference yesterday, several coalition members and supporters said the large yellow and black signs were lawfully posted. They argued that D.C. laws need clarification and revision so that all who post signs are treated the same.
The fines have not stopped the coalition from plastering posters across the city. Coalition members said that as the march draws nearer, they plan to ramp up publicity with more posters, banners and stickers. Sarah Sloan, national staff organizer, said publicity of the fines has brought waves of support and volunteers to the coalition.
"We heard they were taking down posters on Connecticut and Wisconsin," she said, "and the next day there were people out there putting even more up. . . . They can't stop this."