washingtonpost.com
Home   |   Register               Web Search: by Google
channel navigation

Click here for Starpower Internet! E-Campus

CDNOW: buy 3, ship FREE!
 News Home Page
 Photo Galleries
 Politics
 Nation
 World
 Africa
 Americas
 Asia/Pacific
.Europe
 Former USSR
 Middle East
 Columnists
 Search the World
 Special Reports
 Photo Galleries
 Live Online
 World Index
 Metro
 Business/Tech
 Sports
 Style
 Travel
 Health
 Opinion
 Weather
 Weekly Sections
 News Digest
 Classifieds
 Print Edition
 Archives
 News Index
Help
Partners:
Toolbox
Toolbox
Travel
World Weather
Currencies

On the Web
United Nations
U.S. State Dept.
NATO
World Health Org.
_

Holiday Shopping Guide

Panel Finds Switzerland Complicit in Holocaust

By William Drozdiak
Washington Post Foreign Service
Friday, December 10, 1999; 2:49 PM

BERLIN, Dec. 10 An international panel of historians declared today that Switzerland was guilty of acting as an accomplice to the Holocaust when it refused to accept many thousands of fleeing Jews, and instead sent them back to almost almost certain annihilation at the hands of the Nazis.

In a hard-hitting report commissioned three years ago by the Swiss government to re-evaluate the nation's wartime role, the nine-member panel said it had unearthed records proving that Switzerland "declined to help people in mortal danger" when it rejected at least 24,500 Jews between January 1940 and the end of World War II.

Describing their findings as "a lesson for all humanity," the historians condemned the practices of the Swiss government at the time, accusing wartime officials of pursuing an inhumane policy sharply at odds with the country's tradition of offering asylum for those facing persecution.

The massive 956-page study follows a separate independent investigation into the practices of Swiss banks by an international panel headed by former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker that was released Monday. That group uncovered nearly 54,000 dormant accounts linked to Holocaust victims a number far greater than the banks ever acknowledged in the past.

E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Version

   

The release of the two reports seems bound to trigger renewed controversy because they challenge some of Switzerland's most cherished national myths. The Swiss have long believed their oasis of neutrality was preserved by a plucky militia that kept Hitler's forces at bay and that they bravely resisted any dealings with Fascist powers even though their Alpine redoubt was surrounded by Axis armies.

Both reports, however, produced overwhelming evidence that Switzerland collaborated widely in financial and other matters with the Nazi regime even to the point of urging Germany to mark Jewish passports with a "J" to make it easier to prevent them from entering the country.

"For persecuted people, the journey to the Swiss border was already fraught with great danger," said the panel of historians, headed by Swiss professor Jean-Francois Bergier. "By creating additional barriers for them to overcome, Swiss officials helped the Nazi regime achieve its goals, whether intentionally or not."

Switzerland's President Ruth Dreifuss, whose father helped provide a safe haven for fellow Jews, said the findings filled her with "immense sadness." Reading an apology endorsed by the entire cabinet, Dreifuss acknowledged that her country did not live up to its humanitarian tradition by consigning so many refugees to their deaths.

"Nothing can make good the consequences of decisions taken at the time and we pay our respects before the pain of those who were denied access to our territory and were abandoned to unspeakable suffering, deportation and death," the cabinet statement said. "Switzerland's asylum policy at the time was marred by errors, omissions and compromises."

But the government complained that the panel did not place enough importance on "undeniable historical realities" such as Swiss fears about a possible Nazi invasion and the need to maintain foreign trade to ensure the nation's survival as reasons behind the lapse in moral judgment.

Bergier and other members of the panel said they recognized public fears of food shortages and a possible Nazi invasion, but they concluded there was no indication "that opening the border [to refugees] might have provoked an invasion by the Axis or caused insurmountable economic difficulties."

The panel acknowledged that Switzerland did admit 51,000 refugees during the war, including about 20,000 Jews. The historians also found that trains carrying Jewish deportees from France and Italy did not transit Switzerland. And they praised some Swiss citizens for bucking anti-Semitic sentiments embedded in their culture and speaking out in behalf of saving the refugees.

Ephraim Zuroff, director of the Israeli branch of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, applauded Switzerland's initiative in "finally confronting its history." He said the decisions to reconsider the nation's wartime past and to compensate Holocaust survivors and their heirs for lost assets should be emulated by other countries, "especially where people actually participated in mass murder, which is much worse than what the Swiss did."

© 1999 The Washington Post Company